|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 5 November 2000, pp. 2703-2708
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society
RAPID COMMUNICATION
1Research Service (151S), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Syracuse, New York 13210; and 2Institut des Sciences Cognitives, 69675 Bron, France
Clower, Dottie M. and
Driss Boussaoud.
Selective Use of Perceptual Recalibration Versus
Visuomotor Skill Acquisition. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 2703-2708, 2000. Exposure to laterally displacing prisms is
characterized by systematic misreaching in the opposite direction after
prisms are removed. Other learning tasks involving altered visuomotor mappings can often be mastered by the subject with minimal resulting aftereffects. One variable that may account for this difference is the
nature of the feedback provided to the subject: during studies of prism
exposure, subjects usually view the hand itself, whereas in many
studies of visuomotor learning, subjects view a computer-generated
representation of the hand position or movement. We compared the use of
actual feedback of the hand with computer-generated representational
feedback of its position during exposure to laterally displacing
prisms. In the actual feedback condition (ACT), a light on the
fingertip was illuminated immediately at the end of each reach. In the
representational feedback condition (REP), a computer-generated spot of
light was displayed to indicate the exact position of the fingertip at
the end of each reach. Whereas the rate and magnitude of error
correction were the same in both conditions, only the ACT condition
produced the large adaptive aftereffect typically observed after prism
exposure. These results suggest that the perception of a physical
coincidence between the feedback source and the hand may be a key
factor in determining whether adaptation is accomplished through
perceptual recalibration or visuomotor skill acquisition.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Liu and R. A. Scheidt Contributions of Online Visual Feedback to the Learning and Generalization of Novel Finger Coordination Patterns J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2546 - 2557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. J. Smeets, J. J. van den Dobbelsteen, D. D. J. de Grave, R. J. van Beers, and E. Brenner Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration PNAS, December 5, 2006; 103(49): 18781 - 18786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Marotta, G. P. Keith, and J. D. Crawford Task-Specific Sensorimotor Adaptation to Reversing Prisms J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 1104 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Safstrom and B. B. Edin Short-term plasticity of the visuomotor map during grasping movements in humans Learn. Mem., January 1, 2005; 12(1): 67 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. van den Dobbelsteen, E. Brenner, and J. B. J. Smeets Body-Centered Visuomotor Adaptation J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 416 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Buch, S. Young, and J. L. Contreras-Vidal Visuomotor Adaptation in Normal Aging Learn. Mem., January 1, 2003; 10(1): 55 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |