JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 85: 187-196, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bisley, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pasternak, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bisley, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pasternak, T.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 85 No. 1 January 2001, pp. 187-196
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Microstimulation of Cortical Area MT Affects Performance on a Visual Working Memory Task

James W. Bisley, Daniel Zaksas, and Tatiana Pasternak

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642

Bisley, James W., Daniel Zaksas, and Tatiana Pasternak. Microstimulation of Cortical Area MT Affects Performance on a Visual Working Memory Task. J. Neurophysiol. 85: 187-196, 2001. We applied electrical stimulation to physiologically identified sites in macaque middle temporal area (MT) to examine its role in short-term storage of recently encoded information about stimulus motion. We used a behavioral task in which monkeys compared the directions of two moving random-dot stimuli, sample and test, separated by a 1.5-s delay. Four sample directions were used for each site, and the animals had to indicate whether the direction of motion in the sample was the same as or different to the direction of motion in the test. We found that the effect of stimulation of the same directional column in MT depended on the behavioral state of the animal. Although stimulation had strong effects when applied during the encoding and the storage components of the task, these effects were not equivalent. Stimulation applied during the presentation of the sample produced signals interpreted by the monkeys as directional motion. However, the same stimulation introduced during the period of storage no longer produced signals interpreted as unambiguous directional information. We conclude that the directional information used by the monkeys in the working memory task is likely to be provided by neurons in MT, and the use of this information appears to be dependent on the portion of the task during which stimulation was delivered. Finally, the disruptive effects of stimulation during the delay suggest that MT neurons not only participate in the encoding of visual motion information but also in its storage by either maintaining an active connection with the circuitry involved in storage or being an integral component of that circuitry.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Zaksas and T. Pasternak
Directional Signals in the Prefrontal Cortex and in Area MT during a Working Memory for Visual Motion Task.
J. Neurosci., November 8, 2006; 26(45): 11726 - 11742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Zaksas and T. Pasternak
Area MT Neurons Respond to Visual Motion Distant From Their Receptive Fields
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4156 - 4167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
I. Opris, A. Barborica, and V. P. Ferrera
Microstimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Biases Saccade Target Selection
J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2005; 17(6): 893 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. R. Muller, M. G. Philiastides, and W. T. Newsome
Inaugural Article: Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes
PNAS, January 18, 2005; 102(3): 524 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Bisley, D. Zaksas, J. A. Droll, and T. Pasternak
Activity of Neurons in Cortical Area MT During a Memory for Motion Task
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 286 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. E. Mazurek, J. D. Roitman, J. Ditterich, and M. N. Shadlen
A Role for Neural Integrators in Perceptual Decision Making
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2003; 13(11): 1257 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Pasternak and D. Zaksas
Stimulus Specificity and Temporal Dynamics of Working Memory for Visual Motion
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2757 - 2762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online