|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 85 No. 1 January 2001, pp. 235-246
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society
1Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen Eye Hospital, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany; and 2Departamento de Fisiologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, 66075-900 Belém, Pará, Brazil
Kremers, Jan,
Luiz Carlos L. Silveira, and
Bjørg E. Kilavik.
Influence of Contrast on the Responses of Marmoset Lateral
Geniculate Cells to Drifting Gratings. J. Neurophysiol. 85: 235-246, 2001. The responses of lateral geniculate
nucleus (LGN) cells in the common marmoset (Callithrix
jacchus) to drifting luminance or cone isolating gratings of
different spatial frequencies and contrasts were measured. The response
noise, defined as the variability of the responses to single sweeps in
the complex plane, was independent of stimulus contrast and spatial
frequency but increased with increasing overall responsiveness of the
cell. The signal-to-noise ratio of parvocellular (PC) cells was smaller
than of magnocellular (MC) cells. At each contrast, the response
amplitude as a function of spatial frequency could be described with a
difference of Gaussians model. With this model, the sizes and the peak
sensitivities of the receptive field centers and surrounds were
estimated. It was found that receptive field center and surround sizes
of LGN cells decrease slightly with increasing contrast. Further, the
peak sensitivity decreases with increasing contrast. The two factors are involved in a decrease in responsivity (the response per unit contrast) with increasing contrast which is compatible to response saturation for low spatial frequency stimuli. PC cells did not saturate
as much to luminance stimuli although some saturation was found with
cone isolating gratings. We found that the response phase lag of both
PC and MC cells decreased with increasing contrast, which cannot be
explained on the basis of linear response behavior. Apparently the
phase of LGN cell responses to drifting gratings is altered in
comparison with the retinal inputs by additional nonlinearities.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Ichida, L. Schwabe, P. C. Bressloff, and A. Angelucci Response Facilitation From the "Suppressive" Receptive Field Surround of Macaque V1 Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2168 - 2181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Rathbun, H. J. Alitto, T. G. Weyand, and W. M. Usrey Interspike Interval Analysis of Retinal Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 911 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Gaudry and P. Reinagel Benefits of Contrast Normalization Demonstrated in Neurons and Model Cells J. Neurosci., July 25, 2007; 27(30): 8071 - 8079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Souza, B. D. Gomes, C. A. Saito, M. da Silva Filho, and L. C. L. Silveira Spatial Luminance Contrast Sensitivity Measured with Transient VEP: Comparison with Psychophysics and Evidence of Multiple Mechanisms Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3396 - 3404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Kozyrev, L. C. L. Silveira, and J. Kremers Linking lateral interactions in flicker perception to lateral geniculate nucleus cell responses J. Physiol., June 15, 2007; 581(3): 1083 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Victor, E. M. Blessing, J. D. Forte, P. Buzas, and P. R. Martin Response variability of marmoset parvocellular neurons J. Physiol., February 15, 2007; 579(1): 29 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Sceniak, S. Chatterjee, and E. M. Callaway Visual Spatial Summation in Macaque Geniculocortical Afferents J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3474 - 3484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bonin, V. Mante, and M. Carandini The Suppressive Field of Neurons in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10844 - 10856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Webb, C. J. Tinsley, C. J. Vincent, and A. M. Derrington Spatial Distribution of Suppressive Signals Outside the Classical Receptive Field in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1789 - 1797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Weng, C.-I Yeh, C. R. Stoelzel, and J.-M. Alonso Receptive Field Size and Response Latency Are Correlated Within the Cat Visual Thalamus J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3537 - 3547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Kilavik, L. C. L Silveira, and J. Kremers Centre and surround responses of marmoset lateral geniculate neurones at different temporal frequencies J. Physiol., February 1, 2003; 546(3): 903 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Solomon, A. J. R. White, and P. R. Martin Extraclassical Receptive Field Properties of Parvocellular, Magnocellular, and Koniocellular Cells in the Primate Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J. Neurosci., January 1, 2002; 22(1): 338 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |