JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 85: 235-246, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kremers, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kilavik, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kremers, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kilavik, B. E.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 85 No. 1 January 2001, pp. 235-246
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Influence of Contrast on the Responses of Marmoset Lateral Geniculate Cells to Drifting Gratings

Jan Kremers,1 Luiz Carlos L. Silveira,2 and Bjørg E. Kilavik1

 1Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen Eye Hospital, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany; and  2Departamento de Fisiologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, 66075-900 Belém, Pará, Brazil

Kremers, Jan, Luiz Carlos L. Silveira, and Bjørg E. Kilavik. Influence of Contrast on the Responses of Marmoset Lateral Geniculate Cells to Drifting Gratings. J. Neurophysiol. 85: 235-246, 2001. The responses of lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) cells in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) to drifting luminance or cone isolating gratings of different spatial frequencies and contrasts were measured. The response noise, defined as the variability of the responses to single sweeps in the complex plane, was independent of stimulus contrast and spatial frequency but increased with increasing overall responsiveness of the cell. The signal-to-noise ratio of parvocellular (PC) cells was smaller than of magnocellular (MC) cells. At each contrast, the response amplitude as a function of spatial frequency could be described with a difference of Gaussians model. With this model, the sizes and the peak sensitivities of the receptive field centers and surrounds were estimated. It was found that receptive field center and surround sizes of LGN cells decrease slightly with increasing contrast. Further, the peak sensitivity decreases with increasing contrast. The two factors are involved in a decrease in responsivity (the response per unit contrast) with increasing contrast which is compatible to response saturation for low spatial frequency stimuli. PC cells did not saturate as much to luminance stimuli although some saturation was found with cone isolating gratings. We found that the response phase lag of both PC and MC cells decreased with increasing contrast, which cannot be explained on the basis of linear response behavior. Apparently the phase of LGN cell responses to drifting gratings is altered in comparison with the retinal inputs by additional nonlinearities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. M. Ichida, L. Schwabe, P. C. Bressloff, and A. Angelucci
Response Facilitation From the "Suppressive" Receptive Field Surround of Macaque V1 Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2168 - 2181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. L. Rathbun, H. J. Alitto, T. G. Weyand, and W. M. Usrey
Interspike Interval Analysis of Retinal Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 911 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
K. S. Gaudry and P. Reinagel
Benefits of Contrast Normalization Demonstrated in Neurons and Model Cells
J. Neurosci., July 25, 2007; 27(30): 8071 - 8079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
G. S. Souza, B. D. Gomes, C. A. Saito, M. da Silva Filho, and L. C. L. Silveira
Spatial Luminance Contrast Sensitivity Measured with Transient VEP: Comparison with Psychophysics and Evidence of Multiple Mechanisms
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3396 - 3404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
V. Kozyrev, L. C. L. Silveira, and J. Kremers
Linking lateral interactions in flicker perception to lateral geniculate nucleus cell responses
J. Physiol., June 15, 2007; 581(3): 1083 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Victor, E. M. Blessing, J. D. Forte, P. Buzas, and P. R. Martin
Response variability of marmoset parvocellular neurons
J. Physiol., February 15, 2007; 579(1): 29 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. P. Sceniak, S. Chatterjee, and E. M. Callaway
Visual Spatial Summation in Macaque Geniculocortical Afferents
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3474 - 3484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
V. Bonin, V. Mante, and M. Carandini
The Suppressive Field of Neurons in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10844 - 10856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. S. Webb, C. J. Tinsley, C. J. Vincent, and A. M. Derrington
Spatial Distribution of Suppressive Signals Outside the Classical Receptive Field in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1789 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Weng, C.-I Yeh, C. R. Stoelzel, and J.-M. Alonso
Receptive Field Size and Response Latency Are Correlated Within the Cat Visual Thalamus
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3537 - 3547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
B. E. Kilavik, L. C. L Silveira, and J. Kremers
Centre and surround responses of marmoset lateral geniculate neurones at different temporal frequencies
J. Physiol., February 1, 2003; 546(3): 903 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
S. G. Solomon, A. J. R. White, and P. R. Martin
Extraclassical Receptive Field Properties of Parvocellular, Magnocellular, and Koniocellular Cells in the Primate Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J. Neurosci., January 1, 2002; 22(1): 338 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online