JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 85: 1119-1128, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goode, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goode, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, A. F.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 85 No. 3 March 2001, pp. 1119-1128
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Visual Influences on the Development and Recovery of the Vestibuloocular Reflex in the Chicken

Christopher T. Goode,1,2 Donna L. Maney,2 Edwin W Rubel,1,2 and Albert F. Fuchs2,3

 1Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center,  2Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, and  3Regional Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

Goode, Christopher T., Donna L. Maney, Edwin W Rubel, and Albert F. Fuchs. Visual Influences on the Development and Recovery of the Vestibuloocular Reflex in the Chicken. J. Neurophysiol. 85: 1119-1128, 2001. Whenever the head turns, the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) produces compensatory eye movements to help stabilize the image of the visual world on the retina. Uncompensated slip of the visual world across the retina results in a gradual change in VOR gain to minimize the image motion. VOR gain changes naturally during normal development and during recovery from neuronal damage. We ask here whether visual slip is necessary for the development of the chicken VOR (as in other species) and whether it is required for the recovery of the VOR after hair cell loss and regeneration. In the first experiment, chickens were reared under stroboscopic illumination, which eliminated visual slip. The horizontal and vertical VORs (h- and vVORs) were measured at different ages and compared with those of chickens reared in normal light. Strobe-rearing prevented the normal development of both h- and vVORs. After 8 wk of strobe-rearing, 3 days of exposure to normal light caused the VORs to recover partially but not to normal values. In the second experiment, 1-wk-old chicks were treated with streptomycin, which destroys most vestibular hair cells and reduces hVOR gain to zero. In birds, vestibular hair cells regenerate so that after 8 wk in normal illumination they appear normal and hVOR gain returns to values that are normal for birds of that age. The treated birds in this study recovered in either normal or stroboscopic illumination. Their hVOR and vVOR and vestibulocollic reflexes (VCR) were measured and compared with those of untreated, age-matched controls at 8 wk posthatch, when hair cell regeneration is known to be complete. As in previous studies, the gain of the VOR decreased immediately to zero after streptomycin treatment. After 8 wk of recovery under normal light, the hVOR was normal, but vVOR gain was less than normal. After 8 wk of recovery under stroboscopic illumination, hVOR gain was less than normal at all frequencies. VCR recovery was not affected by the strobe environment. When streptomycin-treated, strobe-recovered birds were then placed in normal light for 2 days, hVOR gain returned to normal. Taken together, the results of these experiments suggest that continuous visual feedback can adjust VOR gain. In the absence of appropriate visual stimuli, however, there is a default VOR gain and phase to which birds recover or revert, regardless of age. Thus an 8-wk-old chicken raised in a strobe environment from hatch would have the same gain as a streptomycin-treated chicken that recovers in a strobe environment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Haque, M. Zakir, and J. D. Dickman
Recovery of Gaze Stability During Vestibular Regeneration
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 853 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. D. Muir and K.S.V. Gowri
Role of Motor and Visual Experience During Development of Bipedal Locomotion in Chicks
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3691 - 3697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Grassi, C. Dieni, A. Frondaroli, and V. E. Pettorossi
Influence of visual experience on developmental shift from long-term depression to long-term potentiation in the rat medial vestibular nuclei
J. Physiol., November 1, 2004; 560(3): 767 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. I. Matsui, A. Haque, D. Huss, E. P. Messana, J. A. Alosi, D. W. Roberson, D. A. Cotanche, J. D. Dickman, and M. E. Warchol
Caspase Inhibitors Promote Vestibular Hair Cell Survival and Function after Aminoglycoside Treatment In Vivo
J. Neurosci., July 9, 2003; 23(14): 6111 - 6122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online