|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 85 No. 4 April 2001, pp. 1595-1602
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H7, Canada
Torkkeli, Päivi H.,
Shin-Ichi Sekizawa, and
Andrew S. French.
Inactivation of Voltage-Activated Na+ Currents
Contributes to Different Adaptation Properties of Paired
Mechanosensory Neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 85: 1595-1602, 2001. Voltage-activated sodium current
(INa) is primarily responsible for the
leading edge of the action potential in many neurons. While
INa generally activates rapidly when a
neuron is depolarized, its inactivation properties differ significantly
between different neurons and even within one neuron, where
INa often has slowly and rapidly
inactivating components. INa
inactivation has been suggested to regulate action potential firing
frequency in some cells, but no clear picture of this relationship has
emerged. We studied INa in both
members of the paired mechanosensory neurons of a spider slit-sense
organ, where one neuron adapts rapidly (type A) and the other slowly
(type B) in response to a step depolarization. In both neuron types
INa activated and inactivated with
single time constants of 2-3 ms and 5-10 ms, respectively, varying
with the stimulus intensity. However, there was a clear difference in
the steady-state inactivation properties of the two neuron types, with
the half-maximal inactivation
(V50) being
40.1 mV in type A
neurons and
58.1 mV in type B neurons. Therefore
INa inactivated closer to the resting
potential in the more slowly adapting neurons.
INa also recovered from inactivation
significantly faster in type B than type A neurons, and the recovery
was dependent on conditioning voltage. These results suggest that while
the rate of INa inactivation is not
responsible for the difference in the adaptation behavior of these two
neuron types, the rate of recovery from inactivation may play a major
role. Inactivation at lower potentials could therefore be crucial for
more rapid recovery.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Gollisch and A. V. M. Herz Input-Driven Components of Spike-Frequency Adaptation Can Be Unmasked In Vivo J. Neurosci., August 25, 2004; 24(34): 7435 - 7444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Panek, S. Meisner, and P. H. Torkkeli Distribution and Function of GABAB Receptors in Spider Peripheral Mechanosensilla J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2571 - 2580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gingl and A. S. French Active Signal Conduction through the Sensory Dendrite of a Spider Mechanoreceptor Neuron J. Neurosci., July 9, 2003; 23(14): 6096 - 6101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. DiCaprio, H. Wolf, and A. Buschges Activity-Dependent Sensitivity of Proprioceptive Sensory Neurons in the Stick Insect Femoral Chordotonal Organ J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2387 - 2398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Torkkeli and A. S. French Simulation of Different Firing Patterns in Paired Spider Mechanoreceptor Neurons: The Role of Na+ Channel Inactivation J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 1363 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |