|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 85 No. 5 May 2001, pp. 1914-1922
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society
1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR; 2Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT; and 3Sobell Department of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
van Beers, Robert J.,
Daniel M. Wolpert, and
Patrick Haggard.
Sensorimotor Integration Compensates for Visual Localization
Errors During Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements. J. Neurophysiol. 85: 1914-1922, 2001. To localize a seen object,
the CNS has to integrate the object's retinal location with the
direction of gaze. Here we investigate this process by examining the
localization of static objects during smooth pursuit eye movements. The
normally experienced stability of the visual world during smooth
pursuit suggests that the CNS essentially compensates for the eye
movement when judging target locations. However, certain systematic
localization errors are made, and we use these to study the process of
sensorimotor integration. During an eye movement, a static object's
image moves across the retina. Objects that produce retinal slip are
known to be mislocalized: objects moving toward the fovea are seen too
far on in their trajectory, whereas errors are much smaller for objects
moving away from the fovea. These effects are usually studied by
localizing the moving object relative to a briefly flashed one during
fixation: moving objects are then mislocalized, but flashes are not. In
our first experiment, we found that a similar differential
mislocalization occurs for static objects relative to flashes during
pursuit. This effect is not specific for horizontal pursuit but was
also found in other directions. In a second experiment, we examined how
this effect generalizes to positions outside the line of eye movement.
We found that large localization errors were found in the entire
hemifield ahead of the pursuit target and were predominantly aligned
with the direction of eye movement. In a third experiment, we
determined whether it is the flash or the static object that is
mislocalized ahead of the pursuit target. In contrast to fixation conditions, we found that during pursuit it is the flash, not the
static object, which is mislocalized. In a fourth experiment, we used
egocentric localization to confirm this result. Our results suggest
that the CNS compensates for the retinal localization errors to
maintain position constancy for static objects during pursuit. This
compensation is achieved in the process of sensorimotor integration of
retinal and gaze signals: different retinal areas are integrated with
different gaze signals to guarantee the stability of the visual world.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Kaminiarz, B. Krekelberg, and F. Bremmer Expansion of Visual Space During Optokinetic Afternystagmus (OKAN) J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2470 - 2478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jancke, W. Erlhagen, G. Schoner, and H. R. Dinse Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex J. Physiol., May 1, 2004; 556(3): 971 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Strupp, S Glasauer, E Schneider, T Eggert, M Glaser, K Jahn, and T Brandt Anterior canal failure: ocular torsion without perceptual tilt due to preserved otolith function J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2003; 74(9): 1336 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |