|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 1 July 2001, pp. 326-338
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society
1Neuroscience Program, School of Human Development, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688; 2Coleman Laboratory, Departments of Otolaryngology and Physiology, Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco 94143-0444; and 3Scientific Learning Corporation, Berkeley, California 94104-1075
Kilgard, Michael P.,
Pritesh K. Pandya,
Jessica Vazquez,
Anil Gehi,
Christoph E. Schreiner, and
Michael M. Merzenich.
Sensory Input Directs Spatial and Temporal Plasticity in Primary
Auditory Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 326-338, 2001. The cortical representation of the sensory
environment is continuously modified by experience. Changes in spatial
(receptive field) and temporal response properties of cortical neurons
underlie many forms of natural learning. The scale and direction of
these changes appear to be determined by specific features of the
behavioral tasks that evoke cortical plasticity. The neural mechanisms
responsible for this differential plasticity remain unclear partly
because important sensory and cognitive parameters differ among these tasks. In this report, we demonstrate that differential sensory experience directs differential plasticity using a single paradigm that
eliminates the task-specific variables that have confounded direct
comparison of previous studies. Electrical activation of the basal
forebrain (BF) was used to gate cortical plasticity mechanisms. The
auditory stimulus paired with BF stimulation was systematically varied
to determine how several basic features of the sensory input direct
plasticity in primary auditory cortex (A1) of adult rats. The
distributed cortical response was reconstructed from a dense sampling
of A1 neurons after 4 wk of BF-sound pairing. We have previously used
this method to show that when a tone is paired with BF activation, the
region of the cortical map responding to that tone frequency is
specifically expanded. In this report, we demonstrate that
receptive-field size is determined by features of the stimulus paired
with BF activation. Specifically, receptive fields were narrowed or
broadened as a systematic function of both carrier-frequency
variability and the temporal modulation rate of paired acoustic
stimuli. For example, the mean bandwidth of A1 neurons was increased
(+60%) after pairing BF stimulation with a rapid train of tones and
decreased (
25%) after pairing unmodulated tones of different
frequencies. These effects are consistent with previous reports of
receptive-field plasticity evoked by natural learning. The maximum
cortical following rate and minimum response latency were also modified
as a function of stimulus modulation rate and carrier-frequency
variability. The cortical response to a rapid train of tones was nearly
doubled if BF stimulation was paired with rapid trains of random
carrier frequency, while no following rate plasticity was observed if a
single carrier frequency was used. Finally, we observed significant increases in response strength and total area of functionally defined
A1 following BF activation paired with certain classes of stimuli and
not others. These results indicate that the degree and direction of
cortical plasticity of temporal and receptive-field selectivity are
specified by the structure and schedule of inputs that co-occur with
basal forebrain activation and suggest that the rules of cortical
plasticity do not operate on each elemental stimulus feature
independently of others.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |