The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 2 August 2001, pp. 616-628
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Recruitment of Cat Motoneurons in the Absence of Homonymous Afferent Feedback

 ¹Department of Physiology, Medical School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322; and  ²Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611

Haftel, Valerie K., Jonathan F. Prather, C. J. Heckman, and Timothy C. Cope. Recruitment of Cat Motoneurons in the Absence of Homonymous Afferent Feedback. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 616-628, 2001. This study provides the first test in vivo of the hypothesis that group Ia muscle-stretch afferents aid in preventing reversals in the orderly recruitment of motoneurons. This hypothesis was tested by studying recruitment of motoneurons deprived of homonymous afferent input. Recruitment order was measured in decerebrate, paralyzed cats from dual intra-axonal records obtained simultaneously from pairs of medial gastrocnemius (MG) motoneurons. Pairs of MG motor axons were recruited in eight separate trials of the reflex discharge evoked by stimulation of the caudal cutaneous sural (CCS) nerve. Some reports suggest that reflex recruitment by this cutaneous input should bias recruitment against order by the size principle in which the axon with the slower conduction velocity (CV) in a pair is recruited to fire before the faster CV axon. Recruitment was studied in three groups of cats: ones with the MG nerve intact and untreated (UNTREATED); ones with the MG nerve cut (CUT); and ones with the MG nerve cut and bathed at its proximal end in lidocaine solution (CUT+). The failure of electrical stimulation to initiate a dorsal root volley and the absence of action potentials in MG afferents demonstrated the effective elimination of afferent feedback in the CUT+ group. Recruitment order by the size principle predominated and was not statistically distinguishable among the three groups. The percentage of pairs recruited in reverse order of the size principle was actually smaller in the CUT+ group (6%) than in CUT (15%) or UNTREATED (19%) groups. Thus homonymous afferent feedback is not necessary to prevent recruitment reversal. However, removing homonymous afferent input did result in the expression of inconsistency in order, i.e., switches in recruitment sequence from one trial to the next, for more axon pairs in the CUT+ group (33%) than for the other groups combined (13%). Increased inconsistency in the absence of increased reversal of recruitment order was approximated in computer simulations by increasing time-varying fluctuations in synaptic drive to motoneurons and could not be reproduced simply by deleting synaptic current from group Ia homonymous afferents, regardless of how that current was distributed to the motoneurons. These findings reject the hypothesis that synaptic input from homonymous group Ia afferents is necessary to prevent recruitment reversals, and they are consistent with the assertion that recruitment order is established predominantly by properties intrinsic to motoneurons.