JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 86: 950-960, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burton, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Laughlin, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burton, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Laughlin, S. B.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 2 August 2001, pp. 950-960
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Variations in Photoreceptor Response Dynamics Across the Fly Retina

Brian G. Burton, Ben W. Tatler, and Simon B. Laughlin

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom

Burton, Brian G., Ben W. Tatler, and Simon B. Laughlin. Variations in Photoreceptor Response Dynamics Across the Fly Retina. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 950-960, 2001. Gradients in the spatial properties of retinal cells and their relation to image statistics are well documented. However, less is known of gradients in temporal properties, especially at the level of the photoreceptor for which no account exists. Using light flashes and white-noise-modulated light and current stimuli, we examined the spatial and temporal properties of a single class of photoreceptor (R1-6) within the compound eyes of male blowfly, Calliphora vicina. We find that there is a trend toward higher performance at the front of the eye, both in terms of spatiotemporal resolution and signal-to-noise ratio. The receptive fields of frontal photoreceptors are narrower than those of photoreceptors at the side and back of the eye and response speeds are 20% faster. The signal-to-noise ratio at high frequencies is also greatest at the front of the eye, allowing a 30-40% higher information rate. The power spectra of signals and noise indicate that this elevation of performance results both from shorter responses to individual photons and from a more reliable registration of photon arrival times. These distinctions are characteristic of adaptational changes that normally occur on increasing illumination. However, all photoreceptors were absorbing light at approximately the same mean photon rate during our recordings. We therefore suggest that frontal photoreceptors attain a higher state of light adaptation for a given photon rate. This difference may be achieved by a higher density of (Ca2+ permeable) light-gated channels. Consistent with this hypothesis, membrane-impedance measurements show that frontal photoreceptors have a higher specific conductance than other photoreceptors. This higher conductance provides a better temporal performance but is metabolically expensive. Across the eye, temporal resolution is not proportional to spatial (optical) resolution. Neither is it matched obviously to optic flow. Instead we examine the consequences of an improved temporal resolution in the frontal region for the tracking of small moving targets, a behavior exhibited by male flies. We conclude that the temporal properties of a given class of retinal neuron can vary within a single retina and that this variation may be functionally related to the behavioral requirements of the animal.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Smolka and J. M. Hemmi
Topography of vision and behaviour
J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2009; 212(21): 3522 - 3532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Heimonen, I. Salmela, P. Kontiokari, and M. Weckstrom
Large Functional Variability in Cockroach Photoreceptors: Optimization to Low Light Levels
J. Neurosci., December 27, 2006; 26(52): 13454 - 13462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. D. Straw, E. J. Warrant, and D. C. O'Carroll
A `bright zone' in male hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) eyes and associated faster motion detection and increased contrast sensitivity
J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4339 - 4354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Schmitt, A. Vogt, K. Friedmann, R. Paulsen, and A. Huber
Rhodopsin patterning in central photoreceptor cells of the blowfly Calliphora vicina: cloning and characterization of Calliphora rhodopsins Rh3, Rh5 and Rh6
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2005; 208(7): 1247 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. E. Niven, M. Vahasoyrinki, M. Juusola, and A. S. French
Interactions Between Light-Induced Currents, Voltage-Gated Currents, and Input Signal Properties in Drosophila Photoreceptors
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2696 - 2706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. G. Burton and S. B. Laughlin
Neural images of pursuit targets in the photoreceptor arrays of male and female houseflies Musca domestica
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2003; 206(22): 3963 - 3977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online