JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 86: 1067-1078, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boudreau, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boudreau, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. M.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 3 September 2001, pp. 1067-1078
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Activity in Ventral and Dorsal Premotor Cortex in Response to Predictable Force-Pulse Perturbations in a Precision Grip Task

Marie-Josée Boudreau, Thomas Brochier, Michel Paré, and Allan M. Smith

Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, Département de Physiologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3T8, Canada

Boudreau, Marie-Josée, Thomas Brochier, Michel Paré, and Allan M. Smith. Activity in Ventral and Dorsal Premotor Cortex in Response to Predictable Force-Pulse Perturbations in a Precision Grip Task. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 1067-1078, 2001. This study compared the responses of ventral and dorsal premotor cortex (PMv and PMd) neurons to predictable force-pulse perturbations applied during a precision grip. Three monkeys were trained to grasp an unseen instrumented object between the thumb and index finger and to lift and hold it stationary within a position window for 2-2.5 s. The grip and load forces and the object displacement were measured on each trial. Single-unit activity was recorded from the hand regions in the PMv and PMd. In some conditions a predictable perturbation was applied to the object after 1,500 ms of static holding, whereas in other conditions different random combinations of perturbed and unperturbed trials were given. In the perturbed conditions, some were randomly and intermittently presented with a warning flash, whereas some were unsignaled. The activities of 198 cells were modulated during the task performance. Of these cells, 151 were located in the PMv, and 47 were located in the PMd. Although both PMv and PMd neurons had similar discharge patterns, more PMd neurons (84 vs. 43%) showed early pregrip activity. Forty of 106 PMv and 10/30 PMd cells responded to the perturbation with reflexlike triggered reactions. The latency of this response was always <100 ms with a mean of about 55 ms in both the PMv and the PMd. In contrast, 106 PMv and 30 PMd cells tested with the perturbations, only 9 and 10%, respectively, showed significant but nonspecific adaptations to the perturbation. The warning stimulus did not increase the occurrence of specific responses to the perturbation even though 21 of 42 cells related to the grip task also responded to moving visual stimuli. The responses were retinal and frequently involved limited portions of both foveal and peripheral visual fields. When tested with a 75 × 5.5-cm dark bar on a light background, these cells were sensitive to the direction of movement. In summary, the periarcuate premotor area activity to related to predictable force-pulse perturbations seems to reflect a general increase in excitability in contrast to a more specific anticipatory activity such as recorded in the cerebellum. In spite of the strong cerebello-thalamo-cortical projections, the results of the present study suggest that the cortical premotor areas are not involved in the elaboration of adaptive internal models of hand-object dynamics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. M. Hendrix, C. R. Mason, and T. J. Ebner
Signaling of Grasp Dimension and Grasp Force in Dorsal Premotor Cortex and Primary Motor Cortex Neurons During Reach to Grasp in the Monkey
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 132 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Kourtis, H. F. Kwok, N. Roach, A. M. Wing, and P. Praamstra
Maintaining Grip: Anticipatory and Reactive EEG Responses to Load Perturbations
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. A. Chouinard, G. Leonard, and T. Paus
Role of the Primary Motor and Dorsal Premotor Cortices in the Anticipation of Forces during Object Lifting
J. Neurosci., March 2, 2005; 25(9): 2277 - 2284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Monzee and A. M. Smith
Responses of Cerebellar Interpositus Neurons to Predictable Perturbations Applied to an Object Held in a Precision Grip
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1230 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M.-J. Boudreau and A. M. Smith
Activity in Rostral Motor Cortex in Response to Predictable Force-Pulse Perturbations in a Precision Grip Task
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1079 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online