The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 4 October 2001, pp. 1666-1670
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Forward Versus Backward Walking: Transfer of Podokinetic Adaptation

 ¹Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Neuroscience Research Group, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada; and  ²Balance Disorders Laboratory, Oregon Health Sciences University, Beaverton, Oregon 97006

Earhart, Gammon M., G. Melvill Jones, F. B. Horak, E. W. Block, K. D. Weber, and W. A. Fletcher. Forward Versus Backward Walking: Transfer of Podokinetic Adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 1666-1670, 2001. We asked whether podokinetic adaptation to walking on a circular treadmill transfers to different forms of locomotion. Subjects were blindfolded and asked to walk straight across the floor, in the forward and backward directions, following podokinetic (PK) stimulation that consisted of 30 min of forward walking-in-place on the perimeter of a disk rotating in the clockwise direction. During both forward and backward walking following forward-walking PK stimulation, subjects involuntarily walked along curved trajectories at angular velocities well above vestibular threshold, although they perceived that they were walking along straight paths. The curved paths of forward and backward walking were indistinguishable from one another. Transfer of PK adaptations acquired during forward walking on the turntable to backward walking trials suggests that the PK system controls general locomotor trajectory. Adaptation of the system thus influences forms of locomotion other than that used during acquisition of the adaptation. This transfer also supports the concept that forward and backward walking are controlled by neural networks that share common elements. An interesting feature of the transfer of PK adaptation is that for both forward and backward walking, subjects turned in a counterclockwise direction. As such, the direction of relative rotation between the trunk and feet was maintained for both forward and backward walking. However, the relationship of the lower extremities to the center of rotation was not preserved. The left limb was the inner leg during PK stimulation and forward walking after adaptation, but the left leg was the outer leg during backward walking. These results suggest that PK adaptation affects general locomotor trajectory via a remodeling of the rotational relationship between the trunk and the feet.