JN Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 86: 1937-1954, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merchant, H.
Right arrow Articles by Georgopoulos, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merchant, H.
Right arrow Articles by Georgopoulos, A. P.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 4 October 2001, pp. 1937-1954
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Effects of Optic Flow in Motor Cortex and Area 7a

H. Merchant,1,2 A. Battaglia-Mayer,1,2 and A. P. Georgopoulos1,2,3,4,5

 1Brain Sciences Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis 55417;  2Department of Neuroscience,  3Department of Neurology, and  4Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School; and  5Cognitive Sciences Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

Merchant, H., A. Battaglia-Mayer, and A. P. Georgopoulos. Effects of Optic Flow in Motor Cortex and Area 7a. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 1937-1954, 2001. Moving visual stimuli were presented to behaving monkeys who fixated their eyes and did not move their arm. The stimuli consisted of random dots moving coherently in eight different kinds of motion (right, left, up, downward, expansion, contraction, clockwise, and counterclockwise) and were presented in 25 square patches on a liquid crystal display projection screen. Neuronal activity in the arm area of the motor cortex and area 7a was significantly influenced by the visual stimulation, as assessed using an ANOVA. The percentage of cells with a statistically significant effect of visual stimulation was 3 times greater in area 7a (370/587, 63%) than in motor cortex (148/693, 21.4%). With respect to stimulus properties, its location and kind of motion had differential effects on cell activity in the two areas. Specifically, the percentage of cells with a significant stimulus location effect was ~2.5 times higher in area 7a (311/370, 84%) than in motor cortex (48/148, 32.4%), whereas the percentage of cells with a significant stimulus motion effect was ~2 times higher in the motor cortex (79/148, 53.4%) than in area 7a (102/370, 27.6%). We also assessed the selectivity of responses to particular stimulus motions using a Poisson train analysis and determined the percentage of cells that showed activation in only one stimulus condition. This percentage was 2 times higher in the motor cortex (73.7%) than in area 7a (37.7%). Of all kinds of stimulus motion tested, responses to expanding optic flow were the strongest in both cortical areas. Finally, we compared the activation of motor cortical cells during visual stimulation to that observed during force exertion in a center right-arrow out task. Of 514 cells analyzed for both the motor and visual tasks, 388 (75.5%) showed a significant relation to either or both tasks, as follows: 284/388 (73.2%) cells showed a significant relation only to the motor task, 27/388 (7%) cells showed a significant relation only to the visual task, whereas the remaining 77/388 (19.8%) cells showed significant relations to both tasks. Therefore a total of 361/514 (70.2%) cells were related to the motor task and 104/514 (20.2%) were related to the visual task. Finally, with respect to receptive fields (RFs), there was no clear visual receptive field structure in the motor cortical neuronal responses, in contrast to area 7a where RFs were present and could be modulated by the type of optic flow stimulus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Battaglia-Mayer, M. Mascaro, and R. Caminiti
Temporal Evolution and Strength of Neural Activity in Parietal Cortex during Eye and Hand Movements
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1350 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. J. Logan and C. J. Duffy
Cortical Area MSTd Combines Visual Cues to Represent 3-D Self-Movement
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1494 - 1507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Merchant and A. P. Georgopoulos
Neurophysiology of Perceptual and Motor Aspects of Interception
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Rickert, S. C. de Oliveira, E. Vaadia, A. Aertsen, S. Rotter, and C. Mehring
Encoding of Movement Direction in Different Frequency Ranges of Motor Cortical Local Field Potentials
J. Neurosci., September 28, 2005; 25(39): 8815 - 8824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. Heider, G. Jando, and R. M. Siegel
Functional Architecture of Retinotopy in Visual Association Cortex of Behaving Monkey
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2005; 15(4): 460 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. A. Crowe, M. V. Chafee, B. B. Averbeck, and A. P. Georgopoulos
Neural Activity in Primate Parietal Area 7a Related to Spatial Analysis of Visual Mazes
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2004; 14(1): 23 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. K. Page and C. J. Duffy
Heading Representation in MST: Sensory Interactions and Population Encoding
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1994 - 2013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online