|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 4 October 2001, pp. 1937-1954
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society
1Brain Sciences Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis 55417; 2Department of Neuroscience, 3Department of Neurology, and 4Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School; and 5Cognitive Sciences Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Merchant, H.,
A. Battaglia-Mayer, and
A. P. Georgopoulos.
Effects of Optic Flow in Motor Cortex and Area 7a. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 1937-1954, 2001. Moving
visual stimuli were presented to behaving monkeys who fixated their
eyes and did not move their arm. The stimuli consisted of random dots
moving coherently in eight different kinds of motion (right, left, up,
downward, expansion, contraction, clockwise, and counterclockwise) and
were presented in 25 square patches on a liquid crystal display
projection screen. Neuronal activity in the arm area of the motor
cortex and area 7a was significantly influenced by the visual
stimulation, as assessed using an ANOVA. The percentage of cells with a
statistically significant effect of visual stimulation was 3 times
greater in area 7a (370/587, 63%) than in motor cortex (148/693,
21.4%). With respect to stimulus properties, its location and kind of
motion had differential effects on cell activity in the two areas.
Specifically, the percentage of cells with a significant stimulus
location effect was ~2.5 times higher in area 7a (311/370, 84%) than
in motor cortex (48/148, 32.4%), whereas the percentage of cells with
a significant stimulus motion effect was ~2 times higher in the motor
cortex (79/148, 53.4%) than in area 7a (102/370, 27.6%). We also
assessed the selectivity of responses to particular stimulus motions
using a Poisson train analysis and determined the percentage of cells that showed activation in only one stimulus condition. This percentage was 2 times higher in the motor cortex (73.7%) than in area 7a (37.7%). Of all kinds of stimulus motion tested, responses to expanding optic flow were the strongest in both cortical areas. Finally, we compared the activation of motor cortical cells during visual stimulation to that observed during force exertion in a center
out task. Of 514 cells analyzed for both the motor and
visual tasks, 388 (75.5%) showed a significant relation to either or
both tasks, as follows: 284/388 (73.2%) cells showed a significant
relation only to the motor task, 27/388 (7%) cells showed a
significant relation only to the visual task, whereas the remaining
77/388 (19.8%) cells showed significant relations to both tasks.
Therefore a total of 361/514 (70.2%) cells were related to the motor
task and 104/514 (20.2%) were related to the visual task. Finally,
with respect to receptive fields (RFs), there was no clear visual
receptive field structure in the motor cortical neuronal responses, in
contrast to area 7a where RFs were present and could be modulated by
the type of optic flow stimulus.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Battaglia-Mayer, M. Mascaro, and R. Caminiti Temporal Evolution and Strength of Neural Activity in Parietal Cortex during Eye and Hand Movements Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1350 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Logan and C. J. Duffy Cortical Area MSTd Combines Visual Cues to Represent 3-D Self-Movement Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1494 - 1507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Merchant and A. P. Georgopoulos Neurophysiology of Perceptual and Motor Aspects of Interception J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 1 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rickert, S. C. de Oliveira, E. Vaadia, A. Aertsen, S. Rotter, and C. Mehring Encoding of Movement Direction in Different Frequency Ranges of Motor Cortical Local Field Potentials J. Neurosci., September 28, 2005; 25(39): 8815 - 8824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Heider, G. Jando, and R. M. Siegel Functional Architecture of Retinotopy in Visual Association Cortex of Behaving Monkey Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2005; 15(4): 460 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Crowe, M. V. Chafee, B. B. Averbeck, and A. P. Georgopoulos Neural Activity in Primate Parietal Area 7a Related to Spatial Analysis of Visual Mazes Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2004; 14(1): 23 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Page and C. J. Duffy Heading Representation in MST: Sensory Interactions and Population Encoding J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1994 - 2013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |