JN AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 86: 2219-2230, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grothe, B.
Right arrow Articles by Casseday, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grothe, B.
Right arrow Articles by Casseday, J. H.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 5 November 2001, pp. 2219-2230
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Medial Superior Olive of the Big Brown Bat: Neuronal Responses to Pure Tones, Amplitude Modulations, and Pulse Trains

Benedikt Grothe,1,2 Ellen Covey,3 and John H. Casseday3

 1Zoological Institute, Munich University, D-80333 Munich;  2Max-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany; and  3Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

Grothe, Benedikt, Ellen Covey, and John H. Casseday. Medial Superior Olive of the Big Brown Bat: Neuronal Responses to Pure Tones, Amplitude Modulations, and Pulse Trains. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 2219-2230, 2001. The structure and function of the medial superior olive (MSO) is highly variable among mammals. In species with large heads and low-frequency hearing, MSO is adapted for processing interaural time differences. In some species with small heads and high-frequency hearing, the MSO is greatly reduced in size; in others, including those echolocating bats that have been examined, the MSO is large. Moreover, the MSO of bats appears to have undergone different functional specializations depending on the type of echolocation call used. The echolocation call of the mustached bat contains a prominent CF component, and its MSO is predominantly monaural; the free-tailed bat uses pure frequency-modulated calls, and its MSO is predominantly binaural. To further explore the relation of call structure to MSO properties, we recorded extracellularly from 97 single neurons in the MSO of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, a species whose echolocation call is intermediate between that of the mustached bat and the free-tailed bat. The best frequencies of MSO neurons in the big brown bat ranged from 11 to 79 kHz, spanning most of the audible range. Half of the neurons were monaural, excited by sound at the contralateral ear, while the other half showed evidence of binaural interactions, supporting the idea that the binaural characteristics of MSO neurons in the big brown bat are midway between those of the mustached bat and the free-tailed bat. Within the population of binaural neurons, the majority were excited by sound at the contralateral ear and inhibited by sound at the ipsilateral ear; only 21% were excited by sound at either ear. Discharge patterns were characterized as transient ON (37%), primary-like (33%), or transient OFF (23%). When presented with sinusoidally amplitude modulated tones, most neurons had low-pass filter characteristics with cutoffs between 100 and 300 Hz modulation frequency. For comparison with the sinusoidally modulated sounds, we presented trains of tone pips in which the pulse duration and interstimulus interval were varied. The results of these experiments indicated that it is not the modulation frequency but rather the interstimulus interval that determines the low-pass filter characteristics of MSO neurons.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Dreyer and B. Delgutte
Phase Locking of Auditory-Nerve Fibers to the Envelopes of High-Frequency Sounds: Implications for Sound Localization
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2327 - 2341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Fremouw, P. A. Faure, J. H. Casseday, and E. Covey
Duration Selectivity of Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus of the Big Brown Bat: Tolerance to Changes in Sound Level
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1869 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-E. Grunwald, S. Schornich, and L. Wiegrebe
Classification of natural textures in echolocation
PNAS, April 13, 2004; 101(15): 5670 - 5674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Nabatiyan, J.F.A. Poulet, G. G. de Polavieja, and B. Hedwig
Temporal Pattern Recognition Based on Instantaneous Spike Rate Coding in a Simple Auditory System
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2484 - 2493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Zhang and J. B. Kelly
Glutamatergic and GABAergic Regulation of Neural Responses in Inferior Colliculus to Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 477 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. A. Faure, T. Fremouw, J. H. Casseday, and E. Covey
Temporal Masking Reveals Properties of Sound-Evoked Inhibition in Duration-Tuned Neurons of the Inferior Colliculus
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 3052 - 3065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
O. Behrend, A. Brand, C. Kapfer, and B. Grothe
Auditory Response Properties in the Superior Paraolivary Nucleus of the Gerbil
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2915 - 2928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online