JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 86: 2647-2666, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irvine, D.R.F.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Irvine, D.R.F.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, L.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 6 December 2001, pp. 2647-2666
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Mechanisms Underlying the Sensitivity of Neurons in the Lateral Superior Olive to Interaural Intensity Differences

D.R.F. Irvine, V. N. Park, and L. McCormick

Department of Psychology, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia

Irvine, D.R.F., V. N. Park, and L. McCormick. Mechanisms Underlying the Sensitivity of Neurons in the Lateral Superior Olive to Interaural Intensity Differences. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 2647-2666, 2001. The initial processing of interaural intensity differences (IIDs), the major cue to the azimuthal location of high-frequency sounds in mammals, is carried out by neurons in the lateral superior olivary nucleus (LSO) that receive excitatory input from the ipsilateral ear and inhibitory input from the contralateral ear (IE neurons). The "latency" hypothesis asserts that it is the effects of intensity differences on the latency, and hence the relative timing, of the synaptic inputs to these neurons that is the basis of their sensitivity to IIDs, while other models assign the major role to changes in the relative amplitude of the inputs. To test the latency hypothesis and to determine the contributions of changes in the relative timing and amplitude of synaptic inputs to the IID sensitivity of LSO neurons, a method was developed of generating sets of stimuli that produced either the same changes in the relative timing of inputs without any change in their amplitude (equivalent interaural time difference stimuli) or the same differences in amplitude without any difference in timing (delay-cancelled IID stimuli) as a given range of IIDs. Data were obtained from a sample of IE neurons in the LSO of anesthetized rats using these stimulus paradigms and click and tone-burst stimuli. For click stimuli, the IID sensitivity of a small proportion of neurons was explained entirely by sensitivity to differences in input timing, but the sensitivity of most neurons reflected either sensitivity to the relative amplitude of inputs or to the joint operation of both factors. In neurons whose sensitivity was tested at a number of different absolute sound pressure levels (SPLs), the relative contributions of the two factors tended to differ at different SPLs. The IID sensitivity of onset responses to tone stimuli could be classified into the same three categories but was explained for a larger proportion of neurons by sensitivity to differences in input timing. The IID sensitivity of the late response component of neurons with sustained responses to tones in all cases reflected sensitivity to the relative amplitude of the inputs. The results confirm the contribution of changes in latency produced by intensity changes to the IID sensitivity of the onset responses of many IE neurons in LSO but require rejection of the strong form of the latency hypothesis, which asserts that this factor alone accounts for such sensitivity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Siveke, M. Pecka, A. H. Seidl, S. Baudoux, and B. Grothe
Binaural Response Properties of Low-Frequency Neurons in the Gerbil Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1425 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Zhang and J. B. Kelly
Responses of Neurons in the Rat's Ventral Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus to Monaural and Binaural Tone Bursts
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2501 - 2512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Marsat and G. S. Pollack
Effect of the Temporal Pattern of Contralateral Inhibition on Sound Localization Cues
J. Neurosci., June 29, 2005; 25(26): 6137 - 6144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
D. J. Tollin
The Lateral Superior Olive: A Functional Role in Sound Source Localization
Neuroscientist, April 1, 2003; 9(2): 127 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online