|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 6 December 2001, pp. 2647-2666
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society
Department of Psychology, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
Irvine, D.R.F.,
V. N. Park, and
L. McCormick.
Mechanisms Underlying the Sensitivity of Neurons in the Lateral
Superior Olive to Interaural Intensity Differences. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 2647-2666, 2001. The initial
processing of interaural intensity differences (IIDs), the major cue to
the azimuthal location of high-frequency sounds in mammals, is carried
out by neurons in the lateral superior olivary nucleus (LSO) that
receive excitatory input from the ipsilateral ear and inhibitory input
from the contralateral ear (IE neurons). The "latency" hypothesis
asserts that it is the effects of intensity differences on the latency,
and hence the relative timing, of the synaptic inputs to these neurons
that is the basis of their sensitivity to IIDs, while other models
assign the major role to changes in the relative amplitude of the
inputs. To test the latency hypothesis and to determine the
contributions of changes in the relative timing and amplitude of
synaptic inputs to the IID sensitivity of LSO neurons, a method was
developed of generating sets of stimuli that produced either the same
changes in the relative timing of inputs without any change in their
amplitude (equivalent interaural time difference stimuli) or the same
differences in amplitude without any difference in timing
(delay-cancelled IID stimuli) as a given range of IIDs. Data were
obtained from a sample of IE neurons in the LSO of anesthetized rats
using these stimulus paradigms and click and tone-burst stimuli. For
click stimuli, the IID sensitivity of a small proportion of neurons was
explained entirely by sensitivity to differences in input timing, but
the sensitivity of most neurons reflected either sensitivity to the relative amplitude of inputs or to the joint operation of both factors.
In neurons whose sensitivity was tested at a number of different
absolute sound pressure levels (SPLs), the relative contributions of
the two factors tended to differ at different SPLs. The IID sensitivity
of onset responses to tone stimuli could be classified into the same
three categories but was explained for a larger proportion of neurons
by sensitivity to differences in input timing. The IID sensitivity of
the late response component of neurons with sustained responses to
tones in all cases reflected sensitivity to the relative amplitude of
the inputs. The results confirm the contribution of changes in latency
produced by intensity changes to the IID sensitivity of the onset
responses of many IE neurons in LSO but require rejection of the strong
form of the latency hypothesis, which asserts that this factor alone
accounts for such sensitivity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Siveke, M. Pecka, A. H. Seidl, S. Baudoux, and B. Grothe Binaural Response Properties of Low-Frequency Neurons in the Gerbil Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1425 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang and J. B. Kelly Responses of Neurons in the Rat's Ventral Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus to Monaural and Binaural Tone Bursts J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2501 - 2512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Marsat and G. S. Pollack Effect of the Temporal Pattern of Contralateral Inhibition on Sound Localization Cues J. Neurosci., June 29, 2005; 25(26): 6137 - 6144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Tollin The Lateral Superior Olive: A Functional Role in Sound Source Localization Neuroscientist, April 1, 2003; 9(2): 127 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |