JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 86: 2919-2930, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kogo, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kogo, N.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 6 December 2001, pp. 2919-2930
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Direction Tuning of Inhibitory Inputs to the Turtle Accessory Optic System

Michael Ariel and Naoki Kogo

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63104

Ariel, Michael and Naoki Kogo. Direction Tuning of Inhibitory Inputs to the Turtle Accessory Optic System. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 2919-2930, 2001. Neurons in turtle accessory optic system (basal optic nucleus, BON) were studied to compare excitatory and inhibitory visual inputs. Using a reduced in vitro brain stem preparation with the eyes attached, previous studies only showed a monosynaptic retinal input to the BON from direction-sensitive retinal ganglion cells that share a common preferred direction. Now using an intact brain stem preparation, not only did BON neurons display inhibitory postsynaptic potentials [IPSP(C)s] spontaneously, but IPSP(C)s were also evoked by visual pattern motion, they had their polarity reversed near the chloride equilibrium potential (<IT>E</IT><SUB>Cl<SUP>−</SUP></SUB>) and they were blocked by the GABAA antagonist bicuculline. Because excitatory postsynaptic currents had reversal potentials >0 mV, BON cells were recorded using patch electrodes filled with QX-314 or Cs+ to measure the cell's direction tuning also at that higher reversal potential. For most of the BON neurons studied, their visual excitation and inhibition had a very similar preferred direction, indicating that both synaptic inputs were maximally active onto the same cell under the same stimulus conditions. These competing inputs may result from connections between the pretectum and accessory optic nuclei. Such synaptic interactions may serve a functional role in the visual processing necessary to create retinal slip signals for oculomotor control.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Maurice, H. Gioanni, and A. Abourachid
Influence of the behavioural context on the optocollic reflex (OCR) in pigeons (Columba livia)
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): 292 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Ariel and N. Kogo
Shunting Inhibition in Accessory Optic System Neurons
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1959 - 1969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. R. Winship, P. L. Hurd, and D. R. W. Wylie
Spatiotemporal Tuning of Optic Flow Inputs to the Vestibulocerebellum in Pigeons: Differences Between Mossy and Climbing Fiber Pathways
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1266 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online