JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 86: 3073-3076, 2001;
0022-3077/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rajan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rajan, R.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 86 No. 6 December 2001, pp. 3073-3076
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

RAPID COMMUNICATION

Cochlear Outer-Hair-Cell Efferents and Complex-Sound-Induced Hearing Loss: Protective and Opposing Effects

R. Rajan

Department of Physiology, Monash University, Monash, VIC 3800, Australia

Rajan, R. Cochlear Outer-Hair-Cell Efferents and Complex-Sound-Induced Hearing Loss: Protective and Opposing Effects. J. Neurophysiol. 86: 3073-3076, 2001. Centrifugal crossed and uncrossed medial olivocochlear systems (CMOCS and UMOCS) terminate on cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs) and exercise effects through a nicotinic cholinergic receptor. Hence their cochlear effects have not been differentiated. Recent work on protection from loud-sound-induced temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) in hearing sensitivity suggest the two OHC efferent systems may act differently. This was tested, using traumatic complex sound, to determine if such sound could activate both MOCS components and then reveal whether they exerted different effects on TTSs to such stimuli. Traumatic noise bands activated crossed and uncrossed MOCS efferents. Two different CMOCS effects were observed. For frequencies in the noise (within-band frequencies), it protected hearing sensitivity as expected. Novel findings were that at frequencies higher than the noise band range (high-side frequencies), it acted to worsen hearing sensitivity and that this was opposed by a UMOCS effect generally targeted to these frequency regions. It is proposed that the two crossed MOCS actions are extensions of a contrast-enhancement action for low-level noise bands. It is also proposed that the UMOCS plays a state-restoration role to prevent an undesired CMOCS side-effect of exacerbation of high-side TTSs to high-level noise bands.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Rajan
Contextual Modulation of Olivocochlear Pathway Effects on Loud Sound-Induced Cochlear Hearing Desensitization
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1977 - 1988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online