The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 1 January 2002, pp. 469-477
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Functional Specialization Within the Cat Red Nucleus

Division of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013

Horn, K. M., M. Pong, S. R. Batni, S. M. Levy, and A. R. Gibson. Functional Specialization Within the Cat Red Nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 469-477, 2002. Magnocellular (RNm) and parvicellular (RNp) divisions of the cat red nucleus (RN) project to the cervical spinal cord. RNp projects more heavily to upper cervical levels and RNm projects more heavily to lower levels. The cells in RN are active during reaching and grasping, and the differences in termination suggest that the divisions influence different musculature during this behavior. However, the spinal termination may not reflect function because most rubrospinal terminations are to interneuronal regions, which can influence motor neurons at other spinal levels. To test for functional differences between RNm and RNp, we selectively stimulated RNm and RNp as well as the efferent fibers from each region. Electromyographic activity was recorded from seven muscles of the cat forelimb during reaching. The activity from each muscle was averaged over several thousand stimuli to detect influences of stimulation on muscle activity. Stimulation within the RN produced a characteristic pattern of poststimulus effects. The digit dorsiflexor, extensor digitorum communis (edc), was most likely to show facilitation, and several other muscles showed suppression. The pattern of activation did not differ between RNm and RNp. In contrast, stimulation of RNp fibers favored facilitation of shoulder muscles (spinodeltoideus and supraspinatus), and stimulation of RNm fibers favored facilitation of digit and wrist muscles (edc, palmaris longus, and extensor carpi ulnaris). Fiber stimulation produced few instances of poststimulus suppression. The results from fiber stimulation indicate that the physiological actions of RNm and RNp match their levels of spinal termination. The complex pattern of facilitation and suppression seen with RN stimulation may reflect synaptic actions within the nucleus.