JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 87: 478-492, 2002;
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bierer, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Middlebrooks, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bierer, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Middlebrooks, J. C.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 1 January 2002, pp. 478-492
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Auditory Cortical Images of Cochlear-Implant Stimuli: Dependence on Electrode Configuration

Julie Arenberg Bierer and John C. Middlebrooks

Kresge Hearing Research Institute (Department of Otorhinolaryngology) and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0506

Bierer, Julie Arenberg and John C. Middlebrooks. Auditory Cortical Images of Cochlear-Implant Stimuli: Dependence on Electrode Configuration. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 478-492, 2002. This study examines patterns of auditory cortical activity elicited by single-pulse cochlear implant stimuli that vary in electrode configuration, cochlear place of stimulation, and stimulus level. Recordings were made from the primary auditory cortex (area A1) of ketamine-anesthetized guinea pigs. The spatiotemporal pattern of neural spike activity was measured simultaneously across 16 cortical locations spanning approximately 2-3 octaves of the tonotopic axis. Such a pattern, averaged over 40 presentations of any particular stimulus, was defined as the "cortical image" of that stimulus. Acutely deafened guinea pigs were implanted with a 6-electrode animal version of the 22-electrode Nucleus banded electrode array (Cochlear). Cochlear electrode configurations consisted of monopolar (MP), bipolar (BP + N) with N inactive electrodes between the active and return electrodes (0 <=  N <=  4), tripolar (TP) with one active electrode and two flanking return electrodes, and common ground (CG) with one active electrode and as many as five return electrodes. Cortical images typically showed a focus of maximum spike probability and minimum latency. Spike probabilities tended to decrease, and latencies tended to increase, with increasing cortical distance from that focus. Cortical images of TP stimuli were the most spatially compact, followed by BP + N images, and then MP images, which were the broadest. Images of CG stimuli were rather variable across animals and stimulus channels. The locations of cortical images shifted systematically from caudal to rostral as the cochlear place of stimulation changed from basal to apical. At the most sensitive cortical site for each condition, the dynamic ranges over which spike rates increased with increased current level were restricted to about 1-2 dB, regardless of configuration. Dynamic ranges tended to increase with increasing cortical distance from the most sensitive site. Electrode configurations that produced compact cortical images (e.g., TP and BP + 0) showed the greatest range of thresholds within each cortical image and the largest dynamic range at cortical sites removed from the most sensitive site.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. Middlebrooks
Auditory Cortex Phase Locking to Amplitude-Modulated Cochlear Implant Pulse Trains
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 76 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. Middlebrooks
Cochlear-Implant High Pulse Rate and Narrow Electrode Configuration Impair Transmission of Temporal Information to the Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 92 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Guiraud, J. Besle, L. Arnold, P. Boyle, M.-H. Giard, O. Bertrand, A. Norena, E. Truy, and L. Collet
Evidence of a Tonotopic Organization of the Auditory Cortex in Cochlear Implant Users
J. Neurosci., July 18, 2007; 27(29): 7838 - 7846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. H. Lim and D. J. Anderson
Auditory Cortical Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Inferior Colliculus: Implications for an Auditory Midbrain Implant
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 975 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. J. Tehovnik, A. S. Tolias, F. Sultan, W. M. Slocum, and N. K. Logothetis
Direct and Indirect Activation of Cortical Neurons by Electrical Microstimulation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 512 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. J. Blanche, M. A. Spacek, J. F. Hetke, and N. V. Swindale
Polytrodes: High-Density Silicon Electrode Arrays for Large-Scale Multiunit Recording
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2987 - 3000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. W. Raggio and C. E. Schreiner
Neuronal Responses in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex to Electrical Cochlear Stimulation: IV. Activation Pattern for Sinusoidal Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3190 - 3204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. Middlebrooks and J. A. Bierer
Auditory Cortical Images of Cochlear-Implant Stimuli: Coding of Stimulus Channel and Current Level
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 493 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online