|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 2 February 2002, pp. 712-720
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society
1Department of Pharmacology and 2Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Hämäläinen, Minna M.,
G. F. Gebhart, and
Timothy
J. Brennan.
Acute Effect of an Incision on Mechanosensitive Afferents in
the Plantar Rat Hindpaw. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 712-720, 2002. The purpose of this study was to examine
which primary afferent fibers are sensitized to mechanical stimuli
after an experimental surgical incision to the glabrous skin of the rat
hindpaw. Afferent fibers teased from the L5
dorsal root or the tibial nerve were recorded in anesthetized rats. The
mechanical response properties of each fiber were characterized before
and 45 min after an incision (or sham procedure) within the mechanical
receptive field. Sensitization is characterized by an expansion of the
mechanical receptive field, an increase in background activity, an
increase in response magnitude, or a decrease in response threshold.
After incision, the background activity and response properties of
A
-fibers (n = 9) to mechanical stimuli were
unchanged. Four of 13 mechanosensitive A
-fibers exhibited
sensitization after the incision; response threshold decreased,
response magnitude increased, or receptive field size increased.
Background activity of A
-fibers was not increased by the incision.
Sensitization was observed in 4 of 18 mechanosensitive C-fibers 45 min
after the incision. Background activity of C-fibers was not increased
by the incision. In a group of mechanically insensitive afferent fibers
(MIAs), 3 of 7 A
-fibers and 4 of 10 C-fibers sensitized 45 min after
incision. Response threshold was decreased in only 2 of 17 MIAs;
receptive field size increased in 7 of 17 MIAs. A
-fibers did not
sensitize after the incision, and only 8 of 31 (26%) mechanosensitive
A
- and C-fibers gave evidence of sensitization. In a group of MIA
A
- and C-fibers, a greater percentage of 17 fibers studied (41%)
were sensitized after incision. In this model, the principal effect of
an incision, when examined 45 min after the insult, is an increase in
receptive field size of the afferents, particularly those characterized as MIAs. To the extent that the mechanical hyperalgesia characterized in the same model is initiated in the periphery, it would appear that
spatial summation of modestly increased response magnitude is important
to the development of hyperalgesia.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. N. Wenk, J.-D. Brederson, and C. N. Honda Morphine Directly Inhibits Nociceptors in Inflamed Skin J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2083 - 2097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-K. Cheng, R. C.-C. Chou, L.-L. Hwang, and L.-C. Chiou Antiallodynic Effects of Intrathecal Orexins in a Rat Model of Postoperative Pain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2003; 307(3): 1065 - 1071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Pogatzki, G. F. Gebhart, and T. J. Brennan Characterization of Adelta - and C-Fibers Innervating the Plantar Rat Hindpaw One Day After an Incision J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 721 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |