The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 3 March 2002, pp. 1526-1541
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Electrical Coupling Between Model Midbrain Dopamine Neurons: Effects on Firing Pattern and Synchrony

Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70148

Komendantov, Alexander O. and Carmen C. Canavier. Electrical Coupling Between Model Midbrain Dopamine Neurons: Effects on Firing Pattern and Synchrony. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 1526-1541, 2002. The role of gap junctions between midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons in mechanisms of firing pattern generation and synchronization has not been well characterized experimentally. We modified a multi-compartment model of DA neuron by adding a spike-generating mechanism and electrically coupling the dendrites of two such neurons through gap junctions. The burst-generating mechanism in the model neuron results from the interaction of a N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced current and the sodium pump. The firing patterns exhibited by the two model neurons included low frequency (2-7 Hz) spiking, high-frequency (13-20 Hz) spiking, irregular spiking, regular bursting, irregular bursting, and leader/follower bursting, depending on the parameter values used for the permeability for NMDA-induced current and the conductance for electrical coupling. All of these firing patterns have been observed in physiological neurons, but a systematic dependence of the firing pattern on the covariation of these two parameters has not been established experimentally. Our simulations indicate that electrical coupling facilitates NMDA-induced burst firing via two mechanisms. The first can be observed in a pair of identical cells. At low frequencies (low NMDA), as coupling strength was increased, only a transition from asynchronous to synchronous single-spike firing was observed. At high frequencies (high NMDA), increasing the strength of the electrical coupling in an identical pair resulted in a transition from high-frequency single-spike firing to burst firing, and further increases led to synchronous high-frequency spiking. Weak electrical coupling destabilizes the synchronous solution of the fast spiking subsystems, and in the presence of a slowly varying sodium concentration, the desynchronized spiking solution leads to bursts that are approximately in phase with spikes that are not in phase. Thus this transitional mechanism depends critically on action potential dynamics. The second mechanism for the induction of burst firing requires a heterogeneous pair that is, respectively, too depolarized and too hyperpolarized to burst. The net effect of the coupling is to bias at least one cell into an endogenously burst firing regime. In this case, action potential dynamics are not critical to the transitional mechanism. If electrical coupling is indeed more prominent in vivo due to basal level of modulation of gap junctions in vivo, these results may indicate why NMDA-induced burst firing is easier to observe in vivo as compared in vitro.