JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 87: 1889-1901, 2002;
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrew, D.
Right arrow Articles by Craig, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andrew, D.
Right arrow Articles by Craig, A. D.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 4 April 2002, pp. 1889-1901
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Responses of Spinothalamic Lamina I Neurons to Maintained Noxious Mechanical Stimulation in the Cat

D. Andrew and A. D. Craig

Atkinson Pain Research Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013

Andrew, D. and A. D. Craig. Responses of Spinothalamic Lamina I Neurons to Maintained Noxious Mechanical Stimulation in the Cat. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 1889-1901, 2002. Noxious mechanical stimuli that are maintained for minutes produce a continuous sensation of pain in humans that augments during the stimulus. It has recently been shown with systematic force-controlled stimuli that, while all mechanically responsive nociceptors adapt to these stimuli, the basis for such pain can be ascribed to A-fiber rather than C-fiber nociceptors, based on distinctions in their respective response profiles and stimulus-response functions. The present experiments investigated whether similar distinctions could be made in subsets of nociceptive lamina I spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons using similar maintained stimuli. Twenty-eight lamina I STT neurons in the lumbosacral dorsal horn of barbiturate-anesthetized cats were tested with noxious mechanical stimuli applied with a probe of 0.1 mm2 contact area at forces of 25, 50, and 100 g for 2 min. The neurons were classified as nociceptive-specific (NS, n = 14) or polymodal nociceptive (HPC, n = 14) based on their responses to quantitative thermal stimuli. The NS neurons had greater responses and showed less adaptation than the HPC neurons in response to these stimuli, and they encoded stimulus intensity better. Comparison of the normalized response profiles of all 28 nociceptive lamina I STT neurons, independent of cell classification, revealed 2 subgroups that differed significantly: "Maintained" cells with responses that remained above 50% of the initial peak rate during stimulation and "Adapting" cells with responses that quickly declined to <50%. The Maintained neurons encoded the intensity of the mechanical stimuli better than the Adapting neurons, based on ratiometric functions. A k-means cluster analysis of all 28 cells distinguished the identical two subgroups. These categories corresponded closely to the NS and HPC categories: Maintained cells were mostly NS neurons (10 NS, 3 HPC), and Adapting cells were mostly HPC neurons (4 NS, 11 HPC). Thus the present data are consistent with the distinctions between A-fiber and C-fiber nociceptors observed previously, because A-fiber nociceptors are the predominant input to NS lamina I STT neurons and C-fiber nociceptors are the predominant input to HPC neurons. These findings support the view that NS, but perhaps not HPC, lamina I STT neurons have a role in the pain caused by maintained mechanical stimuli and contribute to the sensations of "first" pain and "sharpness." Nonetheless, none of the units studied showed increasing responses during the stimuli, suggesting a role for other ascending neurons or forebrain integration in the augmenting pain produced by maintained mechanical stimulation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. L. Whitsel, O. V. Favorov, Y. Li, M. Quibrera, and M. Tommerdahl
Area 3a Neuron Response to Skin Nociceptor Afferent Drive
Cereb Cortex, June 4, 2008; (2008) bhn086v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. J. Dougherty, M. A. Sawchuk, and S. Hochman
Properties of Mouse Spinal Lamina I GABAergic Interneurons
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3221 - 3227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. D. Craig
Lamina I, but not Lamina V, Spinothalamic Neurons Exhibit Responses That Correspond With Burning Pain
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2604 - 2609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. D. Craig and D. Andrew
Responses of Spinothalamic Lamina I Neurons to Repeated Brief Contact Heat Stimulation in the Cat
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1902 - 1914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online