|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 5 May 2002, pp. 2520-2530
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society
1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Hearing Research Center and 2Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215-2407
Hancock, Kenneth E. and
Herbert F. Voigt.
Intracellularly Labeled Fusiform Cells in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus
of the Gerbil. II. Comparison of Physiology and Anatomy. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 2520-2530, 2002. Fusiform
cells represent the major class of dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN)
projection neuron. Although much is understood about their physiology
and anatomy, there remain unexplored issues with important functional
implications. These include interspecies differences in DCN physiology
and the nature of the cell-to-cell variations in fusiform cell
physiology. To address these issues, a quantitative examination was
made of the physiology and anatomy of 17 fusiform cells from a
companion study. The results suggest that the basal dendrites
of gerbil fusiform cells may be electrotonically more compact than
those of the cat. This relative decrease in the filtering of excitatory
inputs might account for the lower incidence of type IV units in that
species. These data also suggest that the gerbil DCN lacks the
high-frequency specialization described in the cat, because the
tonotopic arrangement of the gerbil fusiform cells quantitatively
matches the place-frequency map for the gerbil cochlea. Certain
physiological properties have anatomical correlates. First, the basal
dendrites of low spontaneous rate cells are directed away from the soma
only in the caudal direction, while the high spontaneous rate cells
have basal dendrites extending rostrally and caudally. Second, input
resistance was dominated by the surface area of the apical dendrite.
Third, the discharge pattern was correlated with apical dendrite
orientation. Finally, there was a spatial gradient of sensitivity to
broadband noise organized at least partially within an isofrequency
axis. Such trends indicate that neighboring fusiform cells are endowed
with different signal processing capabilities.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E. Street and P. B. Manis Action Potential Timing Precision in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Pyramidal Cells J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4162 - 4172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Caspary, T. A. Schatteman, and L. F. Hughes Age-Related Changes in the Inhibitory Response Properties of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Output Neurons: Role of Inhibitory Inputs J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10952 - 10959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |