JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 87: 2520-2530, 2002;
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Voigt, H. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Voigt, H. F.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 5 May 2002, pp. 2520-2530
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Intracellularly Labeled Fusiform Cells in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus of the Gerbil. II. Comparison of Physiology and Anatomy

Kenneth E. Hancock1 and Herbert F. Voigt1,2

 1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Hearing Research Center and  2Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215-2407

Hancock, Kenneth E. and Herbert F. Voigt. Intracellularly Labeled Fusiform Cells in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus of the Gerbil. II. Comparison of Physiology and Anatomy. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 2520-2530, 2002. Fusiform cells represent the major class of dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) projection neuron. Although much is understood about their physiology and anatomy, there remain unexplored issues with important functional implications. These include interspecies differences in DCN physiology and the nature of the cell-to-cell variations in fusiform cell physiology. To address these issues, a quantitative examination was made of the physiology and anatomy of 17 fusiform cells from a companion study. The results suggest that the basal dendrites of gerbil fusiform cells may be electrotonically more compact than those of the cat. This relative decrease in the filtering of excitatory inputs might account for the lower incidence of type IV units in that species. These data also suggest that the gerbil DCN lacks the high-frequency specialization described in the cat, because the tonotopic arrangement of the gerbil fusiform cells quantitatively matches the place-frequency map for the gerbil cochlea. Certain physiological properties have anatomical correlates. First, the basal dendrites of low spontaneous rate cells are directed away from the soma only in the caudal direction, while the high spontaneous rate cells have basal dendrites extending rostrally and caudally. Second, input resistance was dominated by the surface area of the apical dendrite. Third, the discharge pattern was correlated with apical dendrite orientation. Finally, there was a spatial gradient of sensitivity to broadband noise organized at least partially within an isofrequency axis. Such trends indicate that neighboring fusiform cells are endowed with different signal processing capabilities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. E. Street and P. B. Manis
Action Potential Timing Precision in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Pyramidal Cells
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4162 - 4172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. M. Caspary, T. A. Schatteman, and L. F. Hughes
Age-Related Changes in the Inhibitory Response Properties of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Output Neurons: Role of Inhibitory Inputs
J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10952 - 10959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online