JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 87: 2946-2963, 2002;
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Beuzekom, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Van Gisbergen, J.A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Beuzekom, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Van Gisbergen, J.A.M.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 6 June 2002, pp. 2946-2963
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Collicular Microstimulation During Passive Rotation Does Not Generate Fixed Gaze Shifts

A. D. Van Beuzekom and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen

Department of Biophysics, University of Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Van Beuzekom, A. D. and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen. Collicular Microstimulation During Passive Rotation Does Not Generate Fixed Gaze Shifts. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 2946-2963, 2002. We investigated whether saccades evoked by electrical stimulation (E-saccades) in the superior colliculus can compensate for passive sinusoidal head rotation in yaw so as to keep the rapid gaze shift constant. After accounting for variations in E-saccade onset position, we found significant horizontal metric changes, proportional to head velocity, in 31 of 37 experiments in 2 monkeys. Vertical effects were small. In a substantial fraction of the experiments (14/37), these metric changes represented significant but often insufficient compensatory adjustments in the horizontal component, opposite to the direction of head movement. However, very robust violations of gaze-shift constancy were remarkably common: significant anticompensatory changes in the horizontal component occurred in 17/37 experiments. In these cases, typically involving larger E-saccades, the horizontal component increased in size with rotation into the half field containing the E-saccade and became smaller during opposite rotation. Further analysis showed that, instead of showing a dichotomy, the metric effect actually varied along a continuum from compensatory to strongly anticompensatory. In addition to these metric changes, we found a robust kinematic effect of head rotation in metrically matched E-saccades. In all experiments where the effect was significant (34/37), horizontal peak velocity increased for rotation into the half field where the E-saccade was directed and decreased for opposite rotation. This kinematic effect was again proportional to head velocity and predominant in the horizontal component. Comparison of yaw and pitch rotation at the same stimulation site showed that both expressions of vestibular-saccade interaction (metric and kinematic) tended to align with the direction of rotation. The component-specific nature of the modulation suggests that the effects may have been caused by convergence of saccadic and vestibular signals at a component-coding stage downstream of the colliculus. We suggest that the quick-phase system got access to the common pulse generator as soon as the collicular stimulation had opened the pause-cell gate. Adding such an anticompensatory signal would act to increase the E-saccade horizontal component when the monkey was rotated in the same direction and bring about a decrease in size and peak velocity when it was opposite. In the large majority of experiments the metric changes failed to maintain gaze-shift constancy, either because they were in the wrong direction or because they were too small. Possible reasons for this major departure from the properties of natural gaze shifts are discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. D. Van Beuzekom and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen
Interaction Between Visual and Vestibular Signals for the Control of Rapid Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 306 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online