|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 6 June 2002, pp. 3160-3164
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society
RAPID COMMUNICATION
Laboratory of Neurobiophysics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Inokuma, Yasuko,
Tsuyoshi Inoue,
Satoshi Watanabe, and
Yutaka Kirino.
Two Types of Network Oscillations and Their Odor Responses in the
Primary Olfactory Center of a Terrestrial Mollusk. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 3160-3164, 2002. We
identified two classes of network oscillations with different frequency
ranges in the tentacle ganglion (TG), the primary olfactory center of
the terrestrial mollusk Limax marginatus, and
investigated the responses of these oscillations to odor inputs. A
recent study indicated that there are serotonergic terminals in the TG.
We found that when serotonin was applied to the TG, the spontaneous
network oscillation of about 1.5 Hz in the TG changed its oscillatory
frequency to 0.5 Hz. These two oscillations are distinct, because
1) in most cases, the application of serotonin to the TG
initially inhibited the 1.5-Hz oscillation and subsequently generated
the slow 0.5-Hz oscillation; and 2) occasionally, the application of serotonin did not inhibit the spontaneous 1.5-Hz oscillation, resulting in the coexistence of two network oscillations. Thus the TG has two different oscillatory dynamics. We named the spontaneous 1.5-Hz oscillation the fast oscillation (FO), and the
serotonin-induced 0.5-Hz oscillation the slow oscillation (SO). By
calculating the spatial coherence of the TG oscillations, we found that
the FO is a noncoherent oscillatory mode and the SO is a coherent
oscillatory mode. Finally, odor presentation to the olfactory receptors
selectively modulated the SO by decreasing the oscillatory amplitude,
but the FO was not modulated by the odor input. These results indicate
that 1) the TG has two oscillatory states (FO and SO)
and these states are changed by the extracellular level of serotonin,
and 2) these two oscillatory states have different responses to odors.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Watanabe, Y. Kirino, and A. Gelperin Neural and molecular mechanisms of microcognition in Limax Learn. Mem., August 26, 2008; 15(9): 633 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim, B. H. Singer, and M. Zochowski Changing roles for temporal representation of odorant during the oscillatory response of the olfactory bulb. Neural Comput., April 1, 2006; 18(4): 794 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Inoue, Y. Inokuma, S. Watanabe, and Y. Kirino In Vitro Study of Odor-Evoked Behavior in a Terrestrial Mollusk J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 372 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |