JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 88: 692-698, 2002; doi:10.1152/jn.00457.2001
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frens, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Van der Geest, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frens, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Van der Geest, J. N.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 88 No. 2 August 2002, pp. 692-698
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Scleral Search Coils Influence Saccade Dynamics

M. A. Frens and J. N. Van der Geest

Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Frens, M. A. and J. N. Van der Geest. Scleral Search Coils Influence Saccade Dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 692-698, 2002. The scleral search coil technique is commonly used for recording eye movements. The goal of this paper is to investigate to what extent the placement of scleral search coils onto the eyes influences the kinematics of saccades. To that end saccadic eye movements of human subjects were recorded with an infrared video system, while they wore coils and we compared the main sequence properties with recordings in which no coils were mounted on the eyes. It was found that saccades last longer (by about 8%) and become slower (by about 5%) when both eyes wear coils. This is truly due to the fact that the coils are on the eyes and not due to other factors that are part of this method, such as the scleral anesthesia. The influence of coils in both eyes was also observed when one coil was mounted on one eye only. Therefore the effect that the coils have on the eye movements cannot be attributed to purely mechanical factors, such as inertial load on the eyeball or increased friction. Rather the coils appear to change the oculomotor command signals that drive the saccadic eye movements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Kaminiarz, K. Konigs, and F. Bremmer
The Main Sequence of Human Optokinetic Afternystagmus (OKAN)
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 2889 - 2897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. J. van Beers
The Sources of Variability in Saccadic Eye Movements
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2007; 27(33): 8757 - 8770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. M. J. Houben, J. Goumans, and J. van der Steen
Recording Three-Dimensional Eye Movements: Scleral Search Coils versus Video Oculography
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 179 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. B. J. Smeets and I. T. C. Hooge
Nature of Variability in Saccades
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 12 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online