JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 88: 1234-1244, 2002;
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plotnik, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plotnik, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, J. M.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 88 No. 3 September 2002, pp. 1234-1244
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Reflections of Efferent Activity in Rotational Responses of Chinchilla Vestibular Afferents

Meir Plotnik,1,2 Vladimir Marlinski,1 and Jay M. Goldberg1

Departments of  1Neurobiology, Pharmacology, and Physiology and  2Surgery (Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Plotnik, Meir, Vladimir Marlinski, and Jay M. Goldberg. Reflections of Efferent Activity in Rotational Responses of Chinchilla Vestibular Afferents. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 1234-1244, 2002. To study presumed efferent-mediated responses, we determined if afferents responded to head rotations that stimulated semicircular canals other than the organ being innervated. To minimize stimulation of an afferent's own canal, its plane was placed nearly orthogonal to the rotation plane. Otolith units were tested in a horizontal head position with the ear placed near the rotation axis to minimize linear forces. Under these circumstances, angular-velocity trapezoids (2-s ramps, 2-s plateau) evoked excitatory responses for both rotation directions. These type III responses were considerably larger in decerebrate than in anesthetized preparations. In addition to their being exclusively excitatory, the responses resembled those obtained with electrical stimulation of efferent pathways in including per-stimulus and more prolonged post-stimulus components and in being larger in irregularly discharging than in regularly discharging units. Responses, which were not seen for rotations <80°/s, grew as velocity increased between 80 and 500°/s but were seldom larger than 20 spikes/s. Complete section of the VIIIth nerve abolished type III responses, leaving conventional afferent responses intact. To study the separate contributions of canals on the two sides, responses were compared when the labyrinths were intact and when the ipsilateral or contralateral horizontal canal was mechanically inactivated. Both sides contributed to the efferent-mediated responses. That afferents could be influenced from the contralateral labyrinth was confirmed with the use of unilateral galvanic currents. Following inactivation, excitatory responses were produced by rotations exciting or inhibiting the intact horizontal canal with the responses resulting from excitatory rotations being much larger. Such a response asymmetry is consistent with a semicircular-canal origin for the type III responses. A similar asymmetry was seen in the post-stimulus responses to contralateral cathodal (excitatory) and anodal (inhibitory) galvanic currents. We conclude that the efferent system receives a sufficiently powerful vestibular input from both the ipsilateral and contralateral labyrinths to affect afferent discharge.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. P. Hirvonen, L. B. Minor, T. E. Hullar, and J. P. Carey
Effects of Intratympanic Gentamicin on Vestibular Afferents and Hair Cells in the Chinchilla
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 643 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online