|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 88 No. 4 October 2002, pp. 1605-1613
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society
Department of Neuroscience and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
Brown, Joel E. and
William E. Skaggs.
Concordant and Discordant Coding of Spatial Location in
Populations of Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 1605-1613, 2002. Pyramidal cells
in the rat hippocampus commonly show place-related activity, but it has
been difficult to understand the factors that govern them. A
particularly important question is whether individual cells have
identifiable correlates that can be manipulated independently of the
correlates of other cells. Recently Tanila et al. examined the activity
of small ensembles of hippocampal cells in rats running on a plus-maze
with distinct intra- and extramaze cues. When the two sets of cues were
rotated 90° in opposite directions, some cells followed the intramaze
cues, others followed the extramaze cues, and others "remapped"
unpredictably; moreover, all possible combinations were seen within
simultaneously recorded ensembles. In the current study, CA1 pyramidal
cell population activity was recorded from four rats in a similar
paradigm, using a recording system that permitted the analysis of
ensembles of 4-70 simultaneously recorded units. The results were
consistent with the data from the earlier study in showing an increase
in remapping over time and in showing some place fields following one
of the defined sets of cues while others remapped. When the possibility
of random remapping was controlled for, however, the analysis did not
show significant numbers of place fields following both sets of cues
simultaneously. Furthermore, all rats initially showed fully concordant
responses with all place fields following the local cues. For two rats,
this pattern continued until a new configuration was introduced at
which time all fields switched to follow the distal cues. Taken
together, the results are difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis
that individual hippocampal cells encode information about different
subsets of cues in the environment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Fuhs and D. S. Touretzky A spin glass model of path integration in rat medial entorhinal cortex. J. Neurosci., April 19, 2006; 26(16): 4266 - 4276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Yoganarasimha, X. Yu, and J. J. Knierim Head Direction Cell Representations Maintain Internal Coherence during Conflicting Proximal and Distal Cue Rotations: Comparison with Hippocampal Place Cells J. Neurosci., January 11, 2006; 26(2): 622 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wesierska, C. Dockery, and A. A. Fenton Beyond Memory, Navigation, and Inhibition: Behavioral Evidence for Hippocampus-Dependent Cognitive Coordination in the Rat J. Neurosci., March 2, 2005; 25(9): 2413 - 2419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Samsonovich and G. A. Ascoli A simple neural network model of the hippocampus suggesting its pathfinding role in episodic memory retrieval Learn. Mem., March 1, 2005; 12(2): 193 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |