JN AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 88: 1685-1694, 2002;
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Thach, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Thach, W. T.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 88 No. 4 October 2002, pp. 1685-1694
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Dynamic Coordination of Body Parts During Prism Adaptation

Tod A. Martin,1 Scott A. Norris,1 Bradley E. Greger,3 and W. Thomas Thach1,2

 1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology and  2Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110; and  3Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125

Martin, Tod A., Scott A. Norris, Bradley E. Greger, and W. Thomas Thach. Dynamic Coordination of Body Parts During Prism Adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 1685-1694, 2002. We studied coordination across body parts in throwing during adaptation to prisms. Human subjects threw balls at a target before, during, and after wearing laterally shifting prism eyeglasses. Positions of head, shoulders, arm, and ball were video-recorded continuously. We computed body angles of eyes-in-head, head-on-trunk, trunk-on-arm, and arm-on-ball. In each subject, the gaze-throw adjustment during adaptation was distributed across all sets of coupled body parts. The distribution of coupling changed unpredictably from throw to throw within a single session. The angular variation among coupled body parts was typically significantly larger than angular variation of on-target hits. Thus coupled body parts changed interdependently to account for the high accuracy of ball-on-target. Principal components and Monte Carlo analyses showed variability in body angles across throws with a wide range of variability/stereotypy across subjects. The data support a model of a dynamic and generalized solution as evidenced by the distribution of the gaze-throw adjustment across body parts.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
F. Magescas and C. Prablanc
Automatic Drive of Limb Motor Plasticity
J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2006; 18(1): 75 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. A. Norris, B. Greger, E. N. Hathaway, and W. T. Thach
Purkinje Cell Spike Firing in the Posterolateral Cerebellum: Correlation With Visual Stimulus, Oculomotor Response, and Error Feedback
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1867 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Y. C. Pang, T. Lam, and J. F. Yang
Infants Adapt Their Stepping to Repeated Trip-Inducing Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2731 - 2740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online