JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 88: 1830-1842, 2002;
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nambu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Takada, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nambu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Takada, M.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 88 No. 4 October 2002, pp. 1830-1842
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society

Organization of Corticostriatal Motor Inputs in Monkey Putamen

Atsushi Nambu,1,2 Katsuyuki Kaneda,1,2 Hironobu Tokuno,1,2 and Masahiko Takada1,2

 1Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Neuroscience, Tokyo Metropolitan Organization for Medical Research, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8526; and  2Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan

Nambu, Atsushi, Katsuyuki Kaneda, Hironobu Tokuno, and Masahiko Takada. Organization of Corticostriatal Motor Inputs in Monkey Putamen. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 1830-1842, 2002. To analyze the organization of corticostriatal motor inputs, we examined the neuronal responses in the putamen (Put) to stimulation in the primary motor cortex (MI) and the supplementary motor area (SMA). Stimulating electrodes were chronically implanted in the distal and proximal parts of the forelimb representation of the MI and in the forelimb representation of the SMA in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata). Stimulation in the MI and SMA evoked orthodromic spike discharges in both phasically active and tonically active Put neurons. The latency of excitation evoked by MI stimulation was shorter than that of excitation evoked by SMA stimulation. Neurons responding exclusively to MI stimulation (MI-recipient neurons) and those responding exclusively to SMA stimulation (SMA-recipient neurons) were distributed predominantly in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial portion of the caudal aspect of the Put, respectively. About 20% of the recorded neurons responded concurrently to stimulation in both the MI and SMA (MI + SMA-recipient neurons). These neurons were located in the intermediate zone between the MI- and SMA-recipient zones. More than half of the Put neurons responded to sensorimotor stimulation. Movements of the forelimb were readily elicited by microstimulation in the MI-recipient zone, less frequently in the MI + SMA-recipient zone, and rarely in the SMA-recipient zone. More detailed analysis of the somatotopic arrangement based on cortical inputs, sensorimotor responses, and microstimulation-evoked movements revealed that within the MI- and MI + SMA-recipient zones of the Put, neurons representing the distal part of the forelimb were located more ventrally than those representing the proximal part. No such somatotopy was clearly detected in the SMA-recipient zone. The present results indicate that corticostriatal inputs from the forelimb regions of the MI and SMA are largely segregated. On the other hand, convergent inputs from the MI and SMA were noted on single neurons located at the junction between the two input zones. In addition, the corticostriatal inputs from the forelimb region of the MI exhibited a distal to proximal somatotopic organization along the ventrodorsal axis of the Put.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. Gatev and T. Wichmann
Interactions between Cortical Rhythms and Spiking Activity of Single Basal Ganglia Neurons in the Normal and Parkinsonian State
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2009; 19(6): 1330 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. B. Crapse and M. A. Sommer
Frontal Eye Field Neurons with Spatial Representations Predicted by Their Subcortical Input
J. Neurosci., April 22, 2009; 29(16): 5308 - 5318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Basso and P. Liu
Context-Dependent Effects of Substantia Nigra Stimulation on Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4129 - 4142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Kita, S. Chiken, Y. Tachibana, and A. Nambu
Origins of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor-mediated responses of globus pallidus induced after stimulation of the putamen in the monkey.
J. Neurosci., June 14, 2006; 26(24): 6554 - 6562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Ravel, P. Sardo, E. Legallet, and P. Apicella
Influence of Spatial Information on Responses of Tonically Active Neurons in the Monkey Striatum
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2975 - 2986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
O. Hikosaka, K. Nakamura, and H. Nakahara
Basal Ganglia Orient Eyes to Reward
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 567 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
B A Racette, G J Esper, J Antenor, K J Black, A Burkey, S M Moerlein, T O Videen, V Kotagal, J G Ojemann, and J S Perlmutter
Pathophysiology of parkinsonism due to hydrocephalus
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2004; 75(11): 1617 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Yamada, N. Matsumoto, and M. Kimura
Tonically Active Neurons in the Primate Caudate Nucleus and Putamen Differentially Encode Instructed Motivational Outcomes of Action
J. Neurosci., April 7, 2004; 24(14): 3500 - 3510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online