|
|
||||||||
J Neurophysiol (November 1, 2002). 10.1152/jn.00739.2001
Submitted on 4 September 2001
Accepted on 1 July 2002
Visual Sciences, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Price, Nicholas S. C. and
Michael R. Ibbotson.
Direction-Selective Neurons in the Optokinetic System With
Long-Lasting After-Responses. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 2224-2231, 2002. We describe the responses during and after
motion of slow cells, which are a class of
direction-selective neurons in the pretectal nucleus of the optic tract
(NOT) of the wallaby. Neurons in the NOT respond to optic flow
generated by head movements and drive compensatory optokinetic eye
movements. Motion in the preferred direction produces increased firing
rates in the cells, whereas motion in the opposite direction inhibits
their high spontaneous activities. Neurons were stimulated with moving
spatial sinusoidal gratings through a range of temporal and spatial
frequencies. The slow cells were maximally stimulated at temporal
frequencies <1 Hz and spatial frequencies of 0.13-1 cpd. During
motion, the responses oscillate at the fundamental temporal frequency
of the grating but not at higher-order harmonics. There is prolonged excitation after preferred direction motion and prolonged inhibition after anti-preferred direction motion, which are referred to as same-sign after-responses (SSARs). This is the first time that the
response properties of neurons with SSARs have been reported and
modeled in detail for neurons in the NOT. Slow cell responses during
and after motion are modeled using an array of Reichardt-type motion
detectors that include band-pass temporal prefilters. The oscillatory
behavior during motion and the SSARs can be simulated accurately with
the model by manipulating time constants associated with temporal
filtering in the prefilters and motion detectors. The SSARs of slow
cells are compared with those of previously described
direction-selective neurons, which usually show transient inhibition or
excitation after preferred or anti-preferred direction motion,
respectively. Possible functional roles for slow cells are discussed in
the context of eye movement control.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. R. Ibbotson Contrast and Temporal Frequency-Related Adaptation in the Pretectal Nucleus of the Optic Tract J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 136 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.S.C. Price, M. R. Ibbotson, S. Ono, and M. J. Mustari Rapid Processing of Retinal Slip During Saccades in Macaque Area MT J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 235 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R. Winship, P. L. Hurd, and D. R. W. Wylie Spatiotemporal Tuning of Optic Flow Inputs to the Vestibulocerebellum in Pigeons: Differences Between Mossy and Climbing Fiber Pathways J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1266 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Crowder, M. R.W. Dawson, and D. R.W. Wylie Temporal Frequency and Velocity-Like Tuning in the Pigeon Accessory Optic System J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1829 - 1841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |