| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J Neurophysiol (November 1, 2002). 10.1152/jn.00858.2001
Submitted on 18 October 2001
Accepted on 2 August 2002
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel; 2Schepens Eye Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; and 3Department of Ophthalmology, and 4Program in Neuroscience, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Kagan, Igor,
Moshe Gur, and
D. Max Snodderly.
Spatial Organization of Receptive Fields of V1 Neurons of Alert
Monkeys: Comparison With Responses to Gratings. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 2557-2574, 2002. We studied the
spatial organization of receptive fields and the responses to gratings
of neurons in parafoveal V1 of alert monkeys. Activating regions (ARs)
of 228 cells were mapped with increment and decrement bars while
compensating for fixational eye movements. For cells with two or more
ARs, the overlap between ARs responsive to increments (INC) and ARs
responsive to decrements (DEC) was characterized by a quantitative
overlap index (OI). The distribution of overlap indices was bimodal.
The larger group (78% of cells) was composed of complex cells with
strongly overlapping ARs (OI 
0.5). The smaller group (14%) was
composed of simple cells with minimal spatial overlap of ARs (OI 
0.3). Simple cells were preferentially located in layers dominated
by the magnocellular pathway. A third group of neurons, the
monocontrast cells (8%), responded only to one sign of contrast and
had more sustained responses to flashed stimuli than other cells. One
hundred fourteen neurons were also studied with drifting sinusoidal
gratings of various spatial frequencies and window widths. For complex
cells, the relative modulation (RM, the ratio of the 1st harmonic to the mean firing rate), ranged from 0.6 ± 0.4 to 1.1 ± 0.5 (mean ± SD), depending on the stimulus conditions and the
mode of correction for eye movements. RM was not correlated with the
degree of overlap of ARs, indicating that the spatial organization of
receptive fields cannot reliably be predicted from RM values. In fact,
a subset of complex cells had RM > 1, the traditional criterion for identifying simple cells. However, unlike simple cells, even those
complex cells with high RM could exhibit diverse nonlinear responses
when the spatial frequency or window size was changed. Furthermore, the
responses of complex cells to counterphase gratings were predominantly
nonlinear even harmonics. These results show that RM is not a robust
test of linearity. Our results indicate that complex cells are the most
frequently encountered neurons in primate V1, and their behavior needs
to receive more emphasis in models of visual function.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Gur and D. M. Snodderly Physiological differences between neurons in layer 2 and layer 3 of primary visual cortex (V1) of alert macaque monkeys J. Physiol., May 1, 2008; 586(9): 2293 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Gur and D. M. Snodderly Direction selectivity in V1 of alert monkeys: evidence for parallel pathways for motion processing J. Physiol., December 1, 2007; 585(2): 383 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. A. Crowder, J. van Kleef, B. Dreher, and M. R. Ibbotson Complex Cells Increase Their Phase Sensitivity at Low Contrasts and Following Adaptation J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1155 - 1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. E. Williams and R. M. Shapley A Dynamic Nonlinearity and Spatial Phase Specificity in Macaque V1 Neurons J. Neurosci., May 23, 2007; 27(21): 5706 - 5718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Tang, A. Saul, M. Gur, S. Goei, E. Wong, B. Ersoy, and D. M. Snodderly Eye Position Compensation Improves Estimates of Response Magnitude and Receptive Field Geometry in Alert Monkeys J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3439 - 3448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Bardy, J. Y. Huang, C. Wang, T. FitzGibbon, and B. Dreher 'Simplification' of responses of complex cells in cat striate cortex: suppressive surrounds and 'feedback' inactivation J. Physiol., August 1, 2006; 574(3): 731 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Gur and D. M. Snodderly High Response Reliability of Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex (V1) of Alert, Trained Monkeys Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 888 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Victor, F. Mechler, M. A. Repucci, K. P. Purpura, and T. Sharpee Responses of V1 Neurons to Two-Dimensional Hermite Functions J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 379 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Heimel, S. D. Van Hooser, and S. B. Nelson Laminar Organization of Response Properties in Primary Visual Cortex of the Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3538 - 3554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Gur, I. Kagan, and D. M. Snodderly Orientation and Direction Selectivity of Neurons in V1 of Alert Monkeys: Functional Relationships and Laminar Distributions Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1207 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. B Saul, P. L Carras, and A. L Humphrey Temporal Properties of Inputs to Direction-Selective Neurons in Monkey V1 J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 282 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Ibbotson, N.S.C. Price, and N. A. Crowder On the Division of Cortical Cells Into Simple and Complex Types: A Comparative Viewpoint J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3699 - 3702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. A. Read and B. G. Cumming Measuring V1 Receptive Fields Despite Eye Movements in Awake Monkeys J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2003; 90(2): 946 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
