JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 88: 2684-2699, 2002; doi:10.1152/jn.00253.2002
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbour, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barbour, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.

J Neurophysiol (November 1, 2002). 10.1152/jn.00253.2002
Submitted on 2 April 2002
Accepted on 30 July 2002

Temporal Coherence Sensitivity in Auditory Cortex

Dennis L. Barbour and Xiaoqin Wang

Laboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

Barbour, Dennis L. and Xiaoqin Wang. Temporal Coherence Sensitivity in Auditory Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 2684-2699, 2002. Natural sounds often contain energy over a broad spectral range and consequently overlap in frequency when they occur simultaneously; however, such sounds under normal circumstances can be distinguished perceptually (e.g., the cocktail party effect). Sound components arising from different sources have distinct (i.e., incoherent) modulations, and incoherence appears to be one important cue used by the auditory system to segregate sounds into separately perceived acoustic objects. Here we show that, in the primary auditory cortex of awake marmoset monkeys, many neurons responsive to amplitude- or frequency-modulated tones at a particular carrier frequency [the characteristic frequency (CF)] also demonstrate sensitivity to the relative modulation phase between two otherwise identically modulated tones: one at CF and one at a different carrier frequency. Changes in relative modulation phase reflect alterations in temporal coherence between the two tones, and the most common neuronal response was found to be a maximum of suppression for the coherent condition. Coherence sensitivity was generally found in a narrow frequency range in the inhibitory portions of the frequency response areas (FRA), indicating that only some off-CF neuronal inputs into these cortical neurons interact with on-CF inputs on the same time scales. Over the population of neurons studied, carrier frequencies showing coherence sensitivity were found to coincide with the carrier frequencies of inhibition, implying that inhibitory inputs create the effect. The lack of strong coherence-induced facilitation also supports this interpretation. Coherence sensitivity was found to be greatest for modulation frequencies of 16-128 Hz, which is higher than the phase-locking capability of most cortical neurons, implying that subcortical neurons could play a role in the phenomenon. Collectively, these results reveal that auditory cortical neurons receive some off-CF inputs temporally matched and some temporally unmatched to the on-CF input(s) and respond in a fashion that could be utilized by the auditory system to segregate natural sounds containing similar spectral components (such as vocalizations from multiple conspecifics) based on stimulus coherence.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Nelken, J. K. Bizley, F. R. Nodal, B. Ahmed, A. J. King, and J. W. H. Schnupp
Responses of Auditory Cortex to Complex Stimuli: Functional Organization Revealed Using Intrinsic Optical Signals
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1928 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Okamoto, H. Stracke, C. H. Wolters, F. Schmael, and C. Pantev
Attention Improves Population-Level Frequency Tuning in Human Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., September 26, 2007; 27(39): 10383 - 10390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
V. van Wassenhove and S. S. Nagarajan
Auditory Cortical Plasticity in Learning to Discriminate Modulation Rate
J. Neurosci., March 7, 2007; 27(10): 2663 - 2672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. N. O'Connor, C. I. Petkov, and M. L. Sutter
Adaptive Stimulus Optimization for Auditory Cortical Neurons
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4051 - 4067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. L. Bartlett and X. Wang
Long-Lasting Modulation by Stimulus Context in Primate Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 83 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Lu and X. Wang
Information Content of Auditory Cortical Responses to Time-Varying Acoustic Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 301 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Suta, E. Kvasnak, J. Popelar, and J. Syka
Representation of Species-Specific Vocalizations in the Inferior Colliculus of the Guinea Pig
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3794 - 3808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. L. Barbour and X. Wang
Auditory Cortical Responses Elicited in Awake Primates by Random Spectrum Stimuli
J. Neurosci., August 6, 2003; 23(18): 7194 - 7206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. L. Barbour and X. Wang
Contrast Tuning in Auditory Cortex
Science, February 14, 2003; 299(5609): 1073 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online