|
|
||||||||
J Neurophysiol (November 1, 2002). 10.1152/jn.00289.2002
Submitted on 17 April 2002
Accepted on 28 June 2002
The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021
Li, Wu and
Charles D. Gilbert.
Global Contour Saliency and Local Colinear Interactions. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 2846-2856, 2002. Our visual system can link components of contours
and segregate contours from complex backgrounds based on geometric
grouping rules. This is an important intermediate step in object
recognition. The substrate for contour integration may be based on
contextual interactions and intrinsic horizontal connections seen in
primary visual cortex (V1). We examined the perceptual rules governing contour saliency to determine whether the spatial extents of contextual interactions and horizontal connections match those mediating saliency.
To quantify these rules, we used stimuli composed of randomly oriented
nonoverlapping line segments. Salient contours within this complex
background were formed by colinear alignment of nearby segments.
Contour detectability was measured using a 2-interval-forced-choice
design. Contour detectability deteriorated with increasing spacing
between contour elements and improved as the number of colinear line
elements was increased. At short contour spacing, the detectability
reached a plateau with alignment of a few line segments that together
formed a contour subtending several visual degrees. At intermediate
spacing, saliency built up progressively with a greater number of
colinear lines, extending up to 30°. When contour spacing was beyond
a critical range (about 2°), however, the detectability dropped to
chance levels, regardless of the number of colinear lines. Contour
detectability was found to be a function not only of the relative
spacing of contour elements with respect to the noise elements but also
of the average density of the overall pattern. Furthermore, training
significantly improved contour detection, increasing the critical
spacing of line elements beyond which contours were no longer
detectable. Our data suggest that global contour integration is based
on mechanisms of limited spatial extent, comparable to the interactions
observed in V1. These interactions can cascade over larger distances
provided the spacing of stimulus elements is kept within a limited range.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. N. J. McManus, S. Ullman, and C. D. Gilbert A Computational Model of Perceptual Fill-in Following Retinal Degeneration J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2086 - 2100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Del Viva and R. Agostini Visual Spatial Integration in the Elderly Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2940 - 2946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhang, J. Zheng, I. Watanabe, I. Maruko, H. Bi, E. L. Smith III, and Y. Chino Delayed maturation of receptive field center/surround mechanisms in V2 PNAS, April 19, 2005; 102(16): 5862 - 5867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |