JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 88: 3021-3031, 2002; doi:10.1152/jn.00029.2002
0022-3077/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Strassman, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Strassman, A. M.

J Neurophysiol (December 1, 2002). 10.1152/jn.00029.2002
Submitted on 14 January 2002
Accepted on 26 July 2002

Mechanical Response Properties of A and C Primary Afferent Neurons Innervating the Rat Intracranial Dura

Dan Levy and Andrew M. Strassman

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Levy, Dan and Andrew M. Strassman. Mechanical Response Properties of A and C Primary Afferent Neurons Innervating the Rat Intracranial Dura. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 3021-3031, 2002. The intracranial dura receives a small-fiber sensory innervation from the trigeminal ganglion that is thought to be involved in some types of headaches, including migraine. Mechanical response properties of dural afferent neurons were examined to investigate variation across the population in the properties of threshold, slope, adaptation, and incidence of mechanosensitivity. Dural afferent neurons were recorded in the trigeminal ganglion of urethan-anesthetized rats and were identified by their constant-latency response to dural shock. Neurons were classified as fast A (>5 m/s), slow A (5 >=  conduction velocity (CV) >=  1.5 m/s), or C (<1.5 m/s), based on response latency to dural shock. Mechanical receptive fields were identified by stroking or indenting the outer surface of the dura. Stimulus-response curves were obtained from responses to 2-s constant-force indenting stimuli of graded intensities delivered to the dural receptive field with a servo force-controlled mechanical stimulator. The slow A population had the highest percentage of mechanosensitive units (97%) as well as the highest slopes and the lowest thresholds. Thus by all three criteria, the slow As had the highest mechanosensitivity. Conversely, the fast A population had the lowest mechanosensitivity in that it had the lowest percentage of mechanosensitive units (66%), the lowest slopes, and the highest thresholds. The C population was intermediate with respect to all three properties but was much more similar to the slow As than to the fast As. All three fiber classes showed a negative correlation between slope and threshold. The majority of neurons showed a slowly adapting response to a maintained 2-s stimulus. Adapting neurons could be subdivided based on whether the fitted exponential curve decayed to zero or to a nonzero plateau; the latter group contained the most sensitive neurons in that they had the lowest thresholds and highest slopes. Nonadapting neurons generally had lower initial firing rates than adapting neurons. Fast A neurons exhibited greater and more rapid adaptation than slow A and C neurons. Neurons with the lowest slopes, regardless of CV, had relatively rapid adaptation. The more slowly conducting portion of the C population was distinguished from the other C neurons by a number of properties: more mechanically insensitive neurons, higher thresholds, and more nonadapting neurons. These differences in mechanical response properties may be related in part to differences in membrane currents involved in impulse generation that have been described in subpopulations of dorsal root ganglion cells.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
X.-C. Zhang, A. M. Strassman, R. Burstein, and D. Levy
Sensitization and Activation of Intracranial Meningeal Nociceptors by Mast Cell Mediators
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2007; 322(2): 806 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. M. Strassman and D. Levy
Response Properties of Dural Nociceptors in Relation to Headache
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1298 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Levy and A. M. Strassman
Modulation of Dural Nociceptor Mechanosensitivity by the Nitric Oxide-Cyclic GMP Signaling Cascade
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 766 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Levy, M. Jakubowski, and R. Burstein
Disruption of communication between peripheral and central trigeminovascular neurons mediates the antimigraine action of 5HT1B/1D receptor agonists
PNAS, March 23, 2004; 101(12): 4274 - 4279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online