|
|
||||||||
J Neurophysiol (January 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00058.2002
Submitted on Submitted 30 January 2002; accepted in final form 4 September 2002
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zürich, CH-8091 Zürich; and 2Institute of Theoretical Physics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Bockisch, Christopher J.,
Dominik Straumann, and
Thomas Haslwanter.
Eye Movements During Multi-Axis Whole-Body Rotations. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 355-366, 2003. The
semi-circular canals and the otolith organs both contribute to gaze
stabilization during head movement. We investigated how these sensory
signals interact when they provide conflicting information about head
orientation in space. Human subjects were reoriented 90° in pitch or
roll during long-duration, constant-velocity rotation about the
earth-vertical axis while we measured three-dimensional eye movements.
After the reorientation, the otoliths correctly indicated the static
orientation of the subject with respect to gravity, while the
semicircular canals provided a strong signal of rotation. This rotation
signal from the canals could only be consistent with a static
orientation with respect to gravity if the rotation-axis indicated by
the canals was exactly parallel to gravity. This was not true, so a
cue-conflict existed. These conflicting stimuli elicited motion
sickness and a complex tumbling sensation. Strong horizontal, vertical,
and/or torsional eye movements were also induced, allowing us to study
the influence of the conflict between the otoliths and the canals on
all three eye-movement components. We found a shortening of the
horizontal and vertical time constants of the decay of nystagmus and a
trend for an increase in peak velocity following reorientation. The
dumping of the velocity storage occurred regardless of whether eye
velocity along that axis was compensatory to the head rotation or not.
We found a trend for the axis of eye velocity to reorient to make the
head-velocity signal from the canals consistent with the
head-orientation signal from the otoliths, but this reorientation was
small and only observed when subjects were tilted to upright. Previous
models of canal-otolith interaction could not fully account for our
data, particularly the decreased time constant of the decay of
nystagmus. We present a model with a mechanism that reduces the
velocity-storage component in the presence of a strong cue-conflict.
Our study, supported by other experiments, also indicates that static
otolith signals exhibit considerably smaller effects on eye movements
in humans than in monkeys.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |