JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 89: 472-487, 2003; doi:10.1152/jn.00088.2002
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grace, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Theunissen, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grace, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Theunissen, F. E.

J Neurophysiol (January 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00088.2002
Submitted on Submitted 7 February 2002; accepted in final form 3 September 2002

Selectivity for Conspecific Song in the Zebra Finch Auditory Forebrain

Julie A. Grace, Noopur Amin, Nandini C. Singh, and Frédéric E. Theunissen

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1650

Grace, Julie A., Noopur Amin, Nandini C. Singh, and Frédéric E. Theunissen. Selectivity for Conspecific Song in the Zebra Finch Auditory Forebrain. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 472-487, 2003. The selectivity of neurons in the zebra finch auditory forebrain for natural sounds was investigated systematically. The principal auditory forebrain area in songbirds consists of the tonotopically organized field L complex, which, by its location in the auditory processing stream, can be compared with the auditory cortex of mammals. We also recorded from a secondary auditory area, cHV. Field L and cHV are auditory processing stages that are presynaptic to the specialized song system nuclei where auditory neurons show an extremely selective response for the bird's own song, but weak response to almost any other sounds, including conspecific songs. In our study, we found that neurons in field L and cHV had stronger responses to conspecific song than to synthetic sounds that were designed to match the lower order acoustical properties of song, such as their overall power spectra and AM spectra. Such preferential responses to natural sounds cannot be explained by linear frequency tuning or simple nonlinear intensity tuning and requires linear or nonlinear spectro-temporal neuronal transfer functions tuned to the acoustical properties of song. The selectivity for conspecific songs in field L and cHV might reflect an intermediate auditory processing stage for vocalizations that then contributes to the generation of the very specific selectivity for the bird's own song seen in the postsynaptic song system.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. J. Norena, B. Gourevitch, M. Pienkowski, G. Shaw, and J. J. Eggermont
Increasing Spectrotemporal Sound Density Reveals an Octave-Based Organization in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., September 3, 2008; 28(36): 8885 - 8896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Gill, S. M. N. Woolley, T. Fremouw, and F. E. Theunissen
What's That Sound? Auditory Area CLM Encodes Stimulus Surprise, Not Intensity or Intensity Changes
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2809 - 2820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Boumans, C. Vignal, A. Smolders, J. Sijbers, M. Verhoye, J. Van Audekerke, N. Mathevon, and A. Van der Linden
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Zebra Finch Discerns the Neural Substrate Involved in Segregation of Conspecific Song From Background Noise
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 931 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. S. Shaevitz and F. E. Theunissen
Functional Connectivity Between Auditory Areas Field L and CLM and Song System Nucleus HVC in Anesthetized Zebra Finches
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2747 - 2764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. U. Voss, K. Tabelow, J. Polzehl, O. Tchernichovski, K. K. Maul, D. Salgado-Commissariat, D. Ballon, and S. A. Helekar
Functional MRI of the zebra finch brain during song stimulation suggests a lateralized response topography
PNAS, June 19, 2007; 104(25): 10667 - 10672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Amin, A. Doupe, and F. E. Theunissen
Development of Selectivity for Natural Sounds in the Songbird Auditory Forebrain
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3517 - 3531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. E. Cohen, F. Theunissen, B. E. Russ, and P. Gill
Acoustic Features of Rhesus Vocalizations and Their Representation in the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1470 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Wang, R. Narayan, G. Grana, M. Shamir, and K. Sen
Cortical Discrimination of Complex Natural Stimuli: Can Single Neurons Match Behavior?
J. Neurosci., January 17, 2007; 27(3): 582 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Narayan, G. Grana, and K. Sen
Distinct Time Scales in Cortical Discrimination of Natural Sounds in Songbirds
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 252 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. M. N. Woolley, P. R. Gill, and F. E. Theunissen
Stimulus-Dependent Auditory Tuning Results in Synchronous Population Coding of Vocalizations in the Songbird Midbrain
J. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 26(9): 2499 - 2512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Narayan, A. Ergun, and K. Sen
Delayed Inhibition in Cortical Receptive Fields and the Discrimination of Complex Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2970 - 2975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday
Processing of Modulated Sounds in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Responses to Noise, Frequency Sweeps, and Sinusoidal Amplitude Modulations
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1143 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Hsu, S. M. N. Woolley, T. E. Fremouw, and F. E. Theunissen
Modulation Power and Phase Spectrum of Natural Sounds Enhance Neural Encoding Performed by Single Auditory Neurons
J. Neurosci., October 13, 2004; 24(41): 9201 - 9211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. J. Terpstra, J. J. Bolhuis, and A. M. den Boer-Visser
An Analysis of the Neural Representation of Birdsong Memory
J. Neurosci., May 26, 2004; 24(21): 4971 - 4977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Cardin and M. F. Schmidt
Auditory Responses in Multiple Sensorimotor Song System Nuclei Are Co-Modulated by Behavioral State
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 2148 - 2163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday
Response Properties of Single Neurons in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Response Patterns, Frequency Coding, Intensity Coding, and Spike Latencies
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 136 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online