|
|
||||||||
J Neurophysiol (February 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00563.2002
Submitted on Submitted 15 July 2002; accepted in final form 3 October 2002
Departments of Physiology and Psychology and the Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53711
Reale, Richard A.,
Rick L. Jenison, and
John F. Brugge.
Directional Sensitivity of Neurons in the Primary Auditory (AI)
Cortex: Effects of Sound-Source Intensity Level. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 1024-1038, 2003. Transient sounds were
delivered from different directions in virtual acoustic space while
recording from single neurons in primary auditory cortex (AI) of cats
under general anesthesia. The intensity level of the sound source was
varied parametrically to determine the operating characteristics of the
spatial receptive field. The spatial receptive field was constructed
from the onset latency of the response to a sound at each sampled
direction. Spatial gradients of response latency composing a receptive
field are due partially to a systematic co-dependence on sound-source direction and intensity level. Typically, at any given intensity level,
the distribution of response latency within the receptive field was
unimodal with a range of approximately 3-4 ms, although for some cells
and some levels, the spread could be as much as 20 or as little as 2 ms. Response latency, averaged across directions, differed among
neurons for the same intensity level, and also differed among intensity
levels for the same neuron. Generally, increases in intensity level
resulted in decreases in the mean and variance, which follows an
inverse Gaussian distribution. Receptive field models, based on
response latency, are developed using multiple parameters (azimuth,
elevation, intensity), validated with Monte Carlo simulation, and
their spatial filtering described using spherical harmonic analysis.
Observations from an ensemble of modeled receptive fields are obtained
by linking the inverse Gaussian density to the probabilistic inverse
problem of estimating sound-source direction and intensity. Upper
bounds on acuity is derived from the ensemble using Fisher information,
and the predicted patterns of estimation errors are related to
psychophysical performance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Werner-Reiss and J. M. Groh A Rate Code for Sound Azimuth in Monkey Auditory Cortex: Implications for Human Neuroimaging Studies J. Neurosci., April 2, 2008; 28(14): 3747 - 3758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Mickey and J. C. Middlebrooks Sensitivity of Auditory Cortical Neurons to the Locations of Leading and Lagging Sounds J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 979 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Mrsic-Flogel, A. J. King, and J. W. H. Schnupp Encoding of Virtual Acoustic Space Stimuli by Neurons in Ferret Primary Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3489 - 3503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Jenison and R. A. Reale The Shape of Neural Dependence Neural Comput., April 1, 2004; 16(4): 665 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Mickey and J. C. Middlebrooks Representation of Auditory Space by Cortical Neurons in Awake Cats J. Neurosci., September 24, 2003; 23(25): 8649 - 8663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |