JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 89: 1078-1093, 2003; doi:10.1152/jn.00706.2002
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Recanzone, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Recanzone, G. H.

J Neurophysiol (February 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00706.2002
Submitted on Submitted 19 August 2002; accepted in final form 15 October 2002

Auditory Influences on Visual Temporal Rate Perception

Gregg H. Recanzone

Center for Neuroscience and Section of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, California 95616

Recanzone, Gregg H. Auditory Influences on Visual Temporal Rate Perception. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 1078-1093, 2003. Visual stimuli are known to influence the perception of auditory stimuli in spatial tasks, giving rise to the ventriloquism effect. These influences can persist in the absence of visual input following a period of exposure to spatially disparate auditory and visual stimuli, a phenomenon termed the ventriloquism aftereffect. It has been speculated that the visual dominance over audition in spatial tasks is due to the superior spatial acuity of vision compared with audition. If that is the case, then the auditory system should dominate visual perception in a manner analogous to the ventriloquism effect and aftereffect if one uses a task in which the auditory system has superior acuity. To test this prediction, the interactions of visual and auditory stimuli were measured in a temporally based task in normal human subjects. The results show that the auditory system has a pronounced influence on visual temporal rate perception. This influence was independent of the spatial location, spectral bandwidth, and intensity of the auditory stimulus. The influence was, however, strongly dependent on the disparity in temporal rate between the two stimulus modalities. Further, aftereffects were observed following approximately 20 min of exposure to temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli. These results show that the auditory system can strongly influence visual perception and are consistent with the idea that bimodal sensory conflicts are dominated by the sensory system with the greater acuity for the stimulus parameter being discriminated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Mishra, A. Martinez, T. J. Sejnowski, and S. A. Hillyard
Early Cross-Modal Interactions in Auditory and Visual Cortex Underlie a Sound-Induced Visual Illusion
J. Neurosci., April 11, 2007; 27(15): 4120 - 4131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. L. Dematte, D. Sanabria, R. Sugarman, and C. Spence
Cross-Modal Interactions Between Olfaction and Touch
Chem Senses, May 1, 2006; 31(4): 291 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. O. Elias, A. C. Mason, W. P. Maddison, and R. R. Hoy
Seismic signals in a courting male jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae)
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2003; 206(22): 4029 - 4039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online