|
|
||||||||
J Neurophysiol (February 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00168.2002
Submitted on Submitted 7 March 2002; accepted in final form 7 October 2002
1Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611; and 2Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
Perreault, Eric J.,
Scott J. Day,
Manuel Hulliger,
C. J. Heckman, and
Thomas G. Sandercock.
Summation of Forces From Multiple Motor Units in the Cat Soleus
Muscle. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 738-744, 2003. Nearly all muscle models and most motor control concepts assume
that forces from individual muscle fibers and motor units sum in an
additive manner once effects of in-series tendon compliance are taken
into account. Due to the numerous mechanical linkages between
individual fibers, though, it is unclear whether this assumption is
warranted. This work examined motor unit force summation over a wide
range of muscle forces in the cat soleus. Nonadditive summation implies
a nonlinear summation of motor unit forces. Summation nonlinearities
were quantified during interactions of 10 individual motor units and 4 motor unit bundles containing approximately 10 units each. These
protocols allowed motor unit force summation to be examined from
approximately 0 to 25% of tetanic muscle force. Nonlinear summation
was assessed by comparing the actual forces to the algebraic sum of
individual units and bundles stimulated in isolation. Superadditive
summation meant that the actual force exceeded the algebraic sum,
whereas subadditive summation meant that the actual force was smaller
than the algebraic sum. Experiments tested the hypothesis that
superadditive summation occurs at low force levels when few motor units
are recruited, whereas subadditive summation prevails above 10% of
tetanic force. Results were consistent with this hypothesis. As in
previous studies, nonlinear summation in the soleus was modest, but a
clear transition from predominately superadditive to predominantly
subadditive summation occurred in the range of 6-8% of tetanic force.
The largest nonlinearities were transient and appeared at the onset of
recruitment and derecruitment of groups of motor units. The results are
discussed in terms of the mechanical properties of the connective
tissue forming the tendon and linking muscle fibers.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. G. Keenan and F. J. Valero-Cuevas Experimentally Valid Predictions of Muscle Force and EMG in Models of Motor-Unit Function Are Most Sensitive to Neural Properties J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1581 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Farina, L. Arendt-Nielsen, and T. Graven-Nielsen Effect of temperature on spike-triggered average torque and electrophysiological properties of low-threshold motor units J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2005; 99(1): 197 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Taylor, E. A. Christou, and R. M. Enoka Multiple Features of Motor-Unit Activity Influence Force Fluctuations During Isometric Contractions J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2003; 90(2): 1350 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |