|
|
||||||||
J Neurophysiol (February 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00114.2002
Submitted on Submitted 15 February 2002; accepted in final form 15 October 2002
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Goodkin, H. P. and
W. T. Thach.
Cerebellar Control of Constrained and Unconstrained Movements. I. Nuclear Inactivation. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 884-895, 2003. The aim of this study was to determine in
monkeys if inactivation of dentate and lateral interposed deep
cerebellar nuclei preferentially impairs certain movements relative to
others. Constrained movements of the digits were trained
with digits, hand, and elbow constrained in a cast. Simple
movements were flexion of Thumb or Index. A compound
movement was simultaneous flexion of Thumb+Index. An
unconstrained movement consisted of a reach to, pinch of,
and retrieval of a small food reward (Reach+Pinch). In two monkeys we
mapped the dentate and interpositus with 66 injections of muscimol (3 µl of 5 µg/µl). Thirty-two percent of the injections resulted in
increased reaction times of Thumb, Index, and Thumb+Index (mean = 24, 24, 28 + 26, respectively). Fifty percent of the injections impaired Reach+Pinch, producing target overshoot, curved reach trajectory, missed target (X and Y errors), and
clumsy pinch with dropped fruit bits. Inactivation impaired each
and all of Thumb, Index, Thumb+Index, and Reach+Pinch in 27%,
only Reach+Pinch in 23%, and only Thumb, Index,
Thumb+Index in 5% of injections. In sum, all types of movement were
impaired. Thumb+Index was no more impaired than Thumb or
Index alone, suggesting that the lateral cerebellar nuclei are
not specifically required for combining movements of the two
digits when constrained. Reach+Pinch appeared so greatly impaired and
Thumb, Index, Thumb+Index so little as to be consistent with the
hypothesis that a principal role of the cerebellum is to control those
interactions that occur between body segments in natural
unconstrained movements. However, the fact that all movements were
impaired shows that the cerebellum contributes to the control of all movements.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. S. Soteropoulos and S. N. Baker Bilateral representation in the deep cerebellar nuclei J. Physiol., February 15, 2008; 586(4): 1117 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shipp The importance of being agranular: a comparative account of visual and motor cortex Phil Trans R Soc B, April 29, 2005; 360(1456): 797 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Monzee, T. Drew, and A. M. Smith Effects of Muscimol Inactivation of the Cerebellar Nuclei on Precision Grip J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1240 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Greger, S. A. Norris, and W. T. Thach Spike Firing in the Lateral Cerebellar Cortex Correlated With Movement and Motor Parameters Irrespective of the Effector Limb J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 576 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |