JN AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 89: 1837-1843, 2003; doi:10.1152/jn.00929.2002
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Witney, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Witney, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, D. M.

J Neurophysiol (April 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00929.2002
Submitted on Submitted 17 October 2002; accepted in final form 5 December 2002

Spatial Representation of Predictive Motor Learning

Alice G. Witney and Daniel M. Wolpert

Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom

Witney, Alice G. and Daniel M. Wolpert. Spatial Representation of Predictive Motor Learning. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 1837-1843, 2003. A key feature of skilled motor behavior is the ability of the CNS to predict the consequences of its actions. Such prediction occurs when one hand pulls on an object held in the other hand; the restraining hand generates an anticipatory increase in grip force, thereby preventing the object from slipping. When manipulating a novel object, the CNS adapts its predictive response to ensure that predictions are accurately tuned to the dynamics of the object. Here we examine whether learning to predict the consequences of an action on a novel object is restricted to the actions performed during manipulation or generalizes to novel actions. A bimanual task in which subjects held an object in each hand and the relationship between actions on one object and the motion of the other could be computer controlled from trial-to-trial was used. In four conditions we varied the spatial relationship between the direction of force subjects applied to the left-hand object and the consequent direction of motion of an object held in their right hand, which subjects were required to restrain. The results show that predictive learning was local to the direction of forces experienced during learning and that the magnitude of predictive responses was greatly reduced for novel directions of action of the left hand. The pattern of generalization shows that the representation of predictive learning is spatially local and can be approximated as having a spatially narrow Gaussian basis function.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Tremblay, G. Houle, and D. J. Ostry
Specificity of Speech Motor Learning
J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2426 - 2434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. A. G. Mattar and D. J. Ostry
Modifiability of Generalization in Dynamics Learning
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3321 - 3329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. M. Bays and D. M. Wolpert
Actions and consequences in bimanual interaction are represented in different coordinate systems.
J. Neurosci., June 28, 2006; 26(26): 7121 - 7126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Malfait, P. L. Gribble, and D. J. Ostry
Generalization of Motor Learning Based on Multiple Field Exposures and Local Adaptation
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3327 - 3338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online