JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 89: 2215-2224, 2003. First published December 18, 2002; doi:10.1152/jn.00956.2002
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/4/2215    most recent
00956.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prinz, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fromherz, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prinz, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fromherz, P.

J Neurophysiol (April 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00956.2002
Submitted on Submitted 24 October 2002; accepted in final form 11 December 2002

Effect of Neuritic Cables on Conductance Estimates for Remote Electrical Synapses

Astrid A. Prinz and Peter Fromherz

Department of Membrane and Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, D 82152 Martinsried, Germany

Prinz, Astrid A. and Peter Fromherz. Effect of Neuritic Cables on Conductance Estimates for Remote Electrical Synapses. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 2215-2224, 2003. The conductance of electrical synapses is usually estimated from voltage recordings at the neuronal somata under the assumption that each cell is isopotential. This approach neglects effects of intervening neurites. For a cell pair with unbranched neurites and an electrical synapse at their ends, we used cable theory to derive an analytical expression that relates the synaptic conductance to voltage recordings at the cell bodies and to the neurite properties. The equation implies that the conventional method significantly underestimates the actual synapse conductance if the neurite length is comparable to the electrotonic length constant and if the synaptic conductance is similar to the serial neurite conductance. For an experimental test, we cultured pairs of snail neurons on protein patterns, resulting in a geometry that matched the theoretical model. Using the isopotential theory, we estimated the synapse conductances and found them to be rather weak. To obtain the cable properties, we recorded spatiotemporal maps of signal propagation in the neurites using a voltage-sensitive dye. Fits of these maps to a passive cable model showed that the snail neurons are electrotonically rather compact. Given these features of our experimental system, the synaptic conductances derived with the nonisopotential model deviated from the estimates of the isopotential theory by about 13%. This discrepancy, although small, shows that even in electrotonically compact neurons coupled by weak synapses the impact of the neuritic cables on conductance estimates cannot be neglected. When applied to less compact and more strongly coupled cell pairs in vivo, our approach can supply the realistic estimates of synaptic conductances that are necessary for a better understanding of the role of electrical coupling in neural systems.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Golowasch, G. Thomas, A. L. Taylor, A. Patel, A. Pineda, C. Khalil, and F. Nadim
Membrane Capacitance Measurements Revisited: Dependence of Capacitance Value on Measurement Method in Nonisopotential Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2161 - 2175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online