|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J Neurophysiol (April 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00635.2002
Submitted on Submitted 5 August 2002; accepted in final form 16 December 2002
1Lehrstuhl für Zoologie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany; and 2Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Köppl, Christine and
Catherine E. Carr.
Computational Diversity in the Cochlear Nucleus Angularis of the
Barn Owl. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 2313-2329, 2003. The cochlear nucleus angularis (NA) is widely
assumed to form the starting point of a brain stem pathway for
processing sound intensity in birds. Details of its function are
unclear, however, and its evolutionary origin and relationship to the
mammalian cochlear-nucleus complex are obscure. We have carried out
extracellular single-unit recordings in the NA of ketamine-anesthetized
barn owls. The aim was to re-evaluate the extent of heterogeneity in NA
physiology because recent studies of cellular morphology had established several distinct types. Extensive characterization, using
tuning curves, phase locking, peristimulus time histograms and
rate-level functions for pure tones and noise, revealed five major
response types. The most common one was a primary-like pattern that was
distinguished from auditory-nerve fibers by showing lower vector
strengths of phase locking and/or lower spontaneous rates. Two types of
chopper responses were found (chopper-transient and a rare
chopper-sustained), as well as onset units. Finally, we routinely
encountered a complex response type with a pronounced inhibitory
component, similar to the mammalian typeIV. Evidence is presented that
this range of response types is representative for birds and that
earlier conflicting reports may be due to methodological differences.
All five response types defined were similar to well-known types in the
mammalian cochlear nucleus. This suggests convergent evolution of
neurons specialized for encoding different behaviorally relevant
features of the auditory stimulus. It remains to be investigated whether the different response types correlate with morphological types
and whether they establish different processing streams in the auditory
brain stem of birds.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Yang and A. S. Feng Heterogeneous Biophysical Properties of Frog Dorsal Medullary Nucleus (Cochlear Nucleus) Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 1953 - 1964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. MacLeod, T. K. Horiuchi, and C. E. Carr A Role for Short-Term Synaptic Facilitation and Depression in the Processing of Intensity Information in the Auditory Brain Stem J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2863 - 2874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. MacLeod and C. E. Carr Synaptic Physiology in the Cochlear Nucleus Angularis of the Chick J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2520 - 2529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. G. Louage, M. van der Heijden, and P. X. Joris Enhanced Temporal Response Properties of Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus Neurons to Broadband Noise J. Neurosci., February 9, 2005; 25(6): 1560 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday Response Properties of Single Neurons in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Response Patterns, Frequency Coding, Intensity Coding, and Spike Latencies J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 136 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |