JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 90: 12-20, 2003. First published February 12, 2003; doi:10.1152/jn.01075.2002
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/1/12    most recent
01075.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smeets, J. B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hooge, I. T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smeets, J. B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hooge, I. T. C.

Nature of Variability in Saccades

Jeroen B. J. Smeets1 and Ignace T. C. Hooge2

1Neurowetenschappen, Erasmus MC, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam; and 2Psychonomie, Universiteit Utrecht, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands

Submitted 3 December 2002; accepted in final form 5 February 2003

We studied the variability in saccades by comparing the peak velocities of saccades with the same target amplitude made with different actual amplitudes. We tested three hypotheses: the pulse-height noise hypothesis (peak velocity and amplitude vary proportionally), the localization noise hypothesis (variability in amplitude and peak velocity lie along the main sequence), and the independent noise hypothesis (variability in amplitude and peak velocity are independent). We measured eye orientation in two experiments by a scleral coil and a video system. Surprisingly, the main source of variability of saccades depended on the measurement system used. A combination of localization noise and independent noise best describes the data obtained by the video system. The independent noise (e.g., measurement inaccuracy) was the main source of variability. For the scleral coils, the variability was considerably larger than for the less accurate video system. The pulse-height noise hypothesis best describes this additional variability. Therefore we conclude that pulse-height noise is the main source of variability in saccades measured with scleral coils. We discuss the influence of scleral coils on saccade generation and suggest that a change in motor strategy due to the discomfort of wearing the coils might be the cause of the increased variability.


Address for reprint requests: J.B.J. Smeets, Afdeling Neurowetenschappen, Erasmus MC, Postbus 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands (E-mail: j.smeets{at}erasmusmc.nl).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Voss and H.-J. Bischof
Eye movements of laterally eyed birds are not independent
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2009; 212(10): 1568 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. J. van Beers
The Sources of Variability in Saccadic Eye Movements
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2007; 27(33): 8757 - 8770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.