HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mohr, C. Articles by Bell, C. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mohr, C. Articles by Bell, C. C.

The Mormyromast Region of the Mormyrid Electrosensory Lobe. II. Responses to Input From Central Sources

Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Beaverton, Oregon 97006

Submitted 6 March 2003; accepted in final form 21 April 2003

This is the second in a series of two papers on the mormyromast regions of the electrosensory lobe (ELL) of mormyrid electric fish. In this study, we examined the effects of artificial stimulation of two of the three major central inputs to ELL on different morphologically identified cell types of ELL. The three major central inputs to ELL are the eminentia granularis posterior, the juxtalobar nucleus, and the preeminential nucleus. We stimulated the juxtalobar and preeminential nuclei. We compared the effects of such stimulation with effects of the electric organ corollary discharge (EOCD) on the same cells to understand the origins of EOCD effects in ELL. Responses to juxtalobar stimulation were different in different cell types and remarkably similar to corollary discharge responses in the same cells. In addition, responses to juxtalobar stimulation were consistently depressed when the stimulus was delivered immediately after the naturally occurring EOCD response. These findings indicate that the juxtalobar nucleus is a major source of the EOCD responses of ELL cells. In contrast, preeminential stimulation evoked similar responses in medium ganglionic cells, and the two types of efferent cells that were quite different from the EOCD responses of these cells, suggesting that the preeminential nucleus is less important than the juxtalobar nucleus in determining the EOCD responses of ELL cells. Preeminential responses of medium ganglionic and efferent cells consisted of a short-latency excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) followed by a long-lasting inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP). Both the EPSPs and IPSPs were facilitated when brief bursts of closely spaced stimuli were delivered.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. B. Sawtell, A. Williams, and C. C. Bell Central Control of Dendritic Spikes Shapes the Responses of Purkinje-Like Cells through Spike Timing-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity J. Neurosci., February 14, 2007; 27(7): 1552 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Engelmann, J. Bacelo, E. van den Burg, and K. Grant Sensory and Motor Effects of Etomidate Anesthesia J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 1231 - 1243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. B. Sawtell, C. Mohr, and C. C. Bell Recurrent Feedback in the Mormyrid Electrosensory System: Cells of the Preeminential and Lateral Toral Nuclei J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2090 - 2103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Mohr, P. D. Roberts, and C. C. Bell The Mormyromast Region of the Mormyrid Electrosensory Lobe. I. Responses to Corollary Discharge and Electrosensory Stimuli J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2003; 90(2): 1193 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]