HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tong, C. Articles by Flanagan, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tong, C. Articles by Flanagan, J. R.

Task-Specific Internal Models for Kinematic Transformations

Department of Psychology, Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group in Sensory-Motor Systems, and Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada

Submitted 4 December 2002; accepted in final form 16 April 2003

Numerous studies of motor learning have focused on how people adapt their reaching movements to novel dynamic and visuomotor perturbations that alter the actual or visually perceived motion of the hand. An important finding from this work is that learning of novel dynamics generalizes across different movement tasks. Thus adaptation to an unusual force field generalizes from center-out reaching movements to circular movements (Conditt et al. 1997). This suggests that subjects acquired an internal model of the dynamic environment that could be used to determine the motor commands needed for untrained movements. Using a task interference paradigm, we investigated whether transfer across tasks is also observed when learning visuomotor transformations. On day 1, all subjects adapted to a +30° rotation while making center-out-and-back reaching movements. After a delay of 5 min, different groups of subjects then adapted to a –30° rotation while performing either a continuous tracking task, a figure-eight drawing task, or the center-out-and-back reaching task. All subjects were then retested the next day on the +30° rotation in the reaching task. As expected, subjects who experienced the opposing rotations while performing the same reaching tasks showed no retention of learning for the first rotation when tested on day 2 (Krakauer et al. 1999). In contrast, such retrograde interference was not observed in the two groups of subjects who experienced the opposing rotations while performing different tasks. In fact, their performance on day 2 was similar to that of control subjects who never experienced the opposite rotation. This lack of interference suggests that memory resources for visuomotor rotations are task specific.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Taylor and K. A. Thoroughman Divided Attention Impairs Human Motor Adaptation But Not Feedback Control J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. Quaney, S. Perera, R. Maletsky, C. W. Luchies, and R. J. Nudo Impaired Grip Force Modulation in the Ipsilesional Hand after Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2005; 19(4): 338 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Alahyane and D. Pelisson Long-lasting modifications of saccadic eye movements following adaptation induced in the double-step target paradigm Learn. Mem., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 433 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. Quaney, R. J. Nudo, and K. J. Cole Can Internal Models of Objects be Utilized for Different Prehension Tasks? J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2021 - 2027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Marotta, G. P. Keith, and J. D. Crawford Task-Specific Sensorimotor Adaptation to Reversing Prisms J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 1104 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]