JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 90: 622-630, 2003. First published March 20, 2003; doi:10.1152/jn.00960.2002
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/2/622    most recent
00960.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pavlou, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bronstein, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pavlou, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bronstein, A. M.

Effect of Semicircular Canal Stimulation on the Perception of the Visual Vertical

Marousa Pavlou, Nicole Wijnberg, Mary E. Faldon and Adolfo M. Bronstein

Academic Department of Neuro-Otology, Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom

Submitted 24 October 2002; accepted in final form 15 March 2003

The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is usually considered a measure of otolith function. Herewith we investigate the influence of semicircular canal (SCC) stimulation on the SVV by rotating normal subjects in yaw about an earth-vertical axis, with velocity steps of ± 90°/s, for 60 s. SVV was assessed by setting an illuminated line to perceived earth vertical in darkness, during a per- and postrotary period. Four head positions were tested: upright, 30° backward (chin up) or forward, and ~40° forward from upright. During head upright/backward conditions, a significant SVV tilt (P < 0.01) in the direction opposite to rotation was found that reversed during postrotary responses. The rotationally induced SVV tilt had a time constant of decay of ~30 s. Rotation with the head 30° forward did not affect SVV, whereas the 40° forward tilt caused a direction reversal of SVV responses compared with head upright/backward. Spearman correlation values (Rho) between individual SCC efficiencies in different head positions and mean SVV tilts were 0.79 for posterior, 0.34 for anterior, and – 0.80 for horizontal SCCs. Three-dimensional video-oculography showed that SVV and torsional eye position measurements were highly correlated (0.83) and in the direction opposite to the slow phase torsional vestibuloocular reflex. In conclusion: 1) during yaw axis rotation without reorientation of the head with respect to gravity, the SVV is influenced by SCC stimulation; 2) this effect is mediated by the vertical SCCs, particularly the posterior SCCs; 3) rotationally induced SVV changes are due to torsional ocular tilt; 4) SVV and ocular tilts occur in the "anticompensatory," fast phase direction of the torsional nystagmus; and 5) clinically, abnormal SVV tilts cannot be considered a specific indication of otolith system dysfunction.


Address for reprint requests: A. M. Bronstein, Academic Dept. of Neurootology, Div. of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF UK (E-mail: a.bronstein{at}imperial.ac.uk).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. N. Lorincz and B. J. M. Hess
Dynamic Effects on the Subjective Visual Vertical After Roll Rotation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 657 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R.A.A. Vingerhoets, W. P. Medendorp, and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen
Body-Tilt and Visual Verticality Perception During Multiple Cycles of Roll Rotation
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2264 - 2280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
W. Pagarkar, D.-E. Bamiou, D. Ridout, and L. M. Luxon
Subjective Visual Vertical and Horizontal: Effect of the Preset Angle
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, April 1, 2008; 134(4): 394 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. De Vrijer, W. P. Medendorp, and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen
Shared Computational Mechanism for Tilt Compensation Accounts for Biased Verticality Percepts in Motion and Pattern Vision
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 915 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R.A.A. Vingerhoets, J.A.M. Van Gisbergen, and W. P. Medendorp
Verticality Perception During Off-Vertical Axis Rotation
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3256 - 3268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. G. Kaptein and J. A.M. Van Gisbergen
Canal and Otolith Contributions to Visual Orientation Constancy During Sinusoidal Roll Rotation
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1936 - 1948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. G. Kaptein and J. A. M. Van Gisbergen
Nature of the Transition Between Two Modes of External Space Perception in Tilted Subjects
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3356 - 3369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. G. Kaptein and J. A. M. Van Gisbergen
Interpretation of a Discontinuity in the Sense of Verticality at Large Body Tilt
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 2205 - 2214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.