HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 90/4/2149    most recent 00381.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tollin, D. J. Articles by Yin, T. C.T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tollin, D. J. Articles by Yin, T. C.T.

Psychophysical Investigation of an Auditory Spatial Illusion in Cats: The Precedence Effect

Department of Physiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Submitted 16 April 2003; accepted in final form 7 June 2003

The precedence effect (PE) describes several spatial perceptual phenomena that occur when similar sounds are presented from two different locations and separated by a delay. The mechanisms that produce the effect are thought to be responsible for the ability to localize sounds in reverberant environments. Although the physiological bases for the PE have been studied, little is known about how these sounds are localized by species other than humans. Here we used the search coil technique to measure the eye positions of cats trained to saccade to the apparent locations of sounds. To study the PE, brief broadband stimuli were presented from two locations, with a delay between their onsets; the delayed sound meant to simulate a single reflection. Although the cats accurately localized single sources, the apparent locations of the paired sources depended on the delay. First, the cats exhibited summing localization, the perception of a "phantom" sound located between the sources, for delays < ±400 µs for sources positioned in azimuth along the horizontal plane, but not for sources positioned in elevation along the sagittal plane. Second, consistent with localization dominance, for delays from 400 µs to about 10 ms, the cats oriented toward the leading source location only, with little influence of the lagging source, both for horizontally and vertically placed sources. Finally, the echo threshold was reached for delays >10 ms, where the cats first began to orient to the lagging source on some trials. These data reveal that cats experience the PE phenomena similarly to humans.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. W. Spitzer and T. T. Takahashi Sound Localization by Barn Owls in a Simulated Echoic Environment J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3571 - 3584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Mickey and J. C. Middlebrooks Sensitivity of Auditory Cortical Neurons to the Locations of Leading and Lagging Sounds J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 979 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Tollin, L. C. Populin, J. M. Moore, J. L. Ruhland, and T. C. T. Yin Sound-Localization Performance in the Cat: The Effect of Restraining the Head J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1223 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Tollin, L. C. Populin, and T. C. T. Yin Neural Correlates of the Precedence Effect in the Inferior Colliculus of Behaving Cats J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3286 - 3297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. Spitzer, A. D. S. Bala, and T. T. Takahashi A Neuronal Correlate of the Precedence Effect Is Associated With Spatial Selectivity in the Barn Owl's Auditory Midbrain J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2051 - 2070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]