JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 90: 3137-3154, 2003. First published July 9, 2003; doi:10.1152/jn.00021.2003
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/5/3137    most recent
00021.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kleine, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Büttner, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kleine, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Büttner, U.

Saccade-Related Neurons in the Primate Fastigial Nucleus: What Do They Encode?

J. F. Kleine, Y. Guan and U. Büttner

Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany

Submitted 10 January 2003; accepted in final form 30 June 2003

The cerebellar fastigial oculomotor region (FOR) and the overlying oculomotor vermis (OV) are involved in the control of saccadic eye movements, but nature and function of their saccade-related neuronal signals are not fully understood. There is controversy in at least two major aspects: first, lesion studies in OV/FOR reported eye-position-dependent dysmetria—with FOR lesions, centripetal saccades became more hypermetric than centrifugal saccades—suggesting that the cerebellum may compensate for orbital mechanics. However, single-unit studies failed to reveal corresponding eye-position dependencies in FOR saccade-related discharge patterns. Second, some single-unit studies reported precise correlation between burst and saccade duration in the FOR. However, others stated that FOR bursts were only weakly related to saccade properties. In an attempt to resolve these discrepancies, we recorded single FOR units in monkeys that made horizontal saccades (16°) from different starting positions. Sampling saccades of one fixed amplitude and application of an objective, computer-based burst-detection-routine allowed us to correlate burst parameters (onset latency, peak latency, peak amplitude, number of spikes, duration) and kinematic properties of individual saccades. FOR bursts were found to start and peak earlier and exhibit higher peak burst amplitudes for faster than for slower saccades of the same amplitude. While these correlations between FOR bursts and saccade properties were statistically significant for a minority of ~20–25% of individual units, the same effects were also predominant in the remainder of the neuronal sample and statistically significant on the population level. Neuronal activity was not significantly modulated by eye position itself. However, reflecting differences in saccade velocities but not an actual influence of eye position per se, FOR bursts for centripetal and centrifugal saccades exhibited subtle but systematic differences, which closely paralleled, and hence probably explain, the eye-position dependency of deficits observed after FOR inactivation. Our findings indicate that FOR signals reflect much of the kinematic properties of the saccade. Moreover, they are consistent with the idea that the FOR output is purposefully modified according to these kinematic properties to maintain saccadic accuracy.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. F. Kleine, Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum Großhadern, Marchioninistraße 15, D 81377 München, Germany (E-mail: jkleine{at}brain.nefo.med.uni-muenchen.de).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Quinet and L. Goffart
Head-Unrestrained Gaze Shifts After Muscimol Injection in the Caudal Fastigial Nucleus of the Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3269 - 3283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F.-P. Chen and C. Evinger
Cerebellar Modulation of Trigeminal Reflex Blinks: Interpositus Neurons
J. Neurosci., October 11, 2006; 26(41): 10569 - 10576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
R. J. Krauzlis
The Control of Voluntary Eye Movements: New Perspectives
Neuroscientist, April 1, 2005; 11(2): 124 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
T EGGERT, Y GUAN, O BAYER, and U BUTTNER
Saccades to Moving Targets
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2005; 1039(1): 149 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Goffart, L. L. Chen, and D. L. Sparks
Deficits in Saccades and Fixation During Muscimol Inactivation of the Caudal Fastigial Nucleus in the Rhesus Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3351 - 3367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. F. Kleine, Y. Guan, E. Kipiani, L. Glonti, M. Hoshi, and U. Buttner
Trunk Position Influences Vestibular Responses of Fastigial Nucleus Neurons in the Alert Monkey
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 2090 - 2100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.