JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 90: 3384-3397, 2003. First published August 13, 2003; doi:10.1152/jn.00343.2003
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/5/3384    most recent
00343.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Corbetta, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Corbetta, M.

Quantitative Analysis of Attention and Detection Signals During Visual Search

Gordon L. Shulman1, Mark P. McAvoy2, Melanie C. Cowan2, Serguei V. Astafiev2, Aaron P. Tansy2, Giovanni d'Avossa1,3 and Maurizio Corbetta1,2,4

1Department of Neurology; 2Department of Radiology; 3Alzheimer's Disease Research Center; and 4Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Submitted 8 April 2003; accepted in final form 6 August 2003

Prior work has distinguished regions in the intraparietal sulcus (IPs) and frontal eye field (FEF) involved in the voluntary control of attention, from more ventral regions in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) involved in target detection. The present results show that when subjects search for and detect a visual target stimulus among nontargets, these regions show sensory-, search-, and detection-related signals that both confirm and refine these functional distinctions. The different signals were isolated by an additive model that accounted for a large fraction of BOLD (blood oxygenation level-dependent) signal modulation over the brain. Both IPs and FEF were activated during search through nontargets, consistent with a role in maintaining attention-related signals during search. However, unlike FEF, IPs also showed stimulus-related activations, and may combine signals related to sensory and task-dependent components of salience. Although IPs-FEF showed search-related activations, the TPJ was deactivated during search. TPJ activations were confined to detection-related signals. These results provide a much stronger dissociation between the TPJ and IPs-FEF than previous work, while indicating functional differences between frontal and parietal regions that are often coactivated in studies of attention. Finally, continuous flow models of information processing predict that during search, signals from missed targets should be fed from sensory to associative regions rather than being gated by the decision criterion. Correspondingly, missed targets significantly activated parietal (e.g., right TPJ) and frontal (e.g., anterior insula, anterior cingulate) regions, although with a smaller magnitude than detected targets. Surprisingly, many cortical regions showed equivalent signals from detected targets and the completion of target-absent trials, reflecting a widespread signal unrelated to motor execution.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. Shulman, Department of Neurology, Box 8111, 4525 Scott Ave, Rm. 2104, St. Louis, MO 63110 (E-mail: gordon{at}npg.wustl.edu).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Brunetti, S. Della Penna, A. Ferretti, C. Del Gratta, F. Cianflone, P. Belardinelli, M. Caulo, V. Pizzella, M. Olivetti Belardinelli, and G. L. Romani
A Frontoparietal Network for Spatial Attention Reorienting in the Auditory Domain: A Human fMRI/MEG Study of Functional and Temporal Dynamics
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1139 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. C. Ruff, S. Bestmann, F. Blankenburg, O. Bjoertomt, O. Josephs, N. Weiskopf, R. Deichmann, and J. Driver
Distinct Causal Influences of Parietal Versus Frontal Areas on Human Visual Cortex: Evidence from Concurrent TMS-fMRI
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 817 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. P. Mitchell
Activity in Right Temporo-Parietal Junction is Not Selective for Theory-of-Mind
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 262 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
D. Ansari, I. M. Lyons, L. van Eimeren, and F. Xu
Linking Visual Attention and Number Processing in the Brain: The Role of the Temporo-parietal Junction in Small and Large Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Number Comparison.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2007; 19(11): 1845 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
G. L. Shulman, S. V. Astafiev, M. P. McAvoy, G. d'Avossa, and M. Corbetta
Right TPJ Deactivation during Visual Search: Functional Significance and Support for a Filter Hypothesis
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2625 - 2633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
I. Indovina and E. Macaluso
Dissociation of Stimulus Relevance and Saliency Factors during Shifts of Visuospatial Attention
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1701 - 1711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. T. Serences and S. Yantis
Spatially Selective Representations of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Priority in Human Occipital, Parietal, and Frontal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 284 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. D. Fox, M. Corbetta, A. Z. Snyder, J. L. Vincent, and M. E. Raichle
Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems
PNAS, June 27, 2006; 103(26): 10046 - 10051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
C. C. Ruff and J. Driver
Attentional preparation for a lateralized visual distractor: behavioral and fMRI evidence.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2006; 18(4): 522 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. M. Kincade, R. A. Abrams, S. V. Astafiev, G. L. Shulman, and M. Corbetta
An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention
J. Neurosci., May 4, 2005; 25(18): 4593 - 4604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Bledowski, D. Prvulovic, K. Hoechstetter, M. Scherg, M. Wibral, R. Goebel, and D. E. J. Linden
Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
J. Neurosci., October 20, 2004; 24(42): 9353 - 9360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.