|
|
||||||||
1Department of Neurology; 2Department of Radiology; 3Alzheimer's Disease Research Center; and 4Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Submitted 8 April 2003; accepted in final form 6 August 2003
Prior work has distinguished regions in the intraparietal sulcus (IPs) and frontal eye field (FEF) involved in the voluntary control of attention, from more ventral regions in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) involved in target detection. The present results show that when subjects search for and detect a visual target stimulus among nontargets, these regions show sensory-, search-, and detection-related signals that both confirm and refine these functional distinctions. The different signals were isolated by an additive model that accounted for a large fraction of BOLD (blood oxygenation level-dependent) signal modulation over the brain. Both IPs and FEF were activated during search through nontargets, consistent with a role in maintaining attention-related signals during search. However, unlike FEF, IPs also showed stimulus-related activations, and may combine signals related to sensory and task-dependent components of salience. Although IPs-FEF showed search-related activations, the TPJ was deactivated during search. TPJ activations were confined to detection-related signals. These results provide a much stronger dissociation between the TPJ and IPs-FEF than previous work, while indicating functional differences between frontal and parietal regions that are often coactivated in studies of attention. Finally, continuous flow models of information processing predict that during search, signals from missed targets should be fed from sensory to associative regions rather than being gated by the decision criterion. Correspondingly, missed targets significantly activated parietal (e.g., right TPJ) and frontal (e.g., anterior insula, anterior cingulate) regions, although with a smaller magnitude than detected targets. Surprisingly, many cortical regions showed equivalent signals from detected targets and the completion of target-absent trials, reflecting a widespread signal unrelated to motor execution.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Brunetti, S. Della Penna, A. Ferretti, C. Del Gratta, F. Cianflone, P. Belardinelli, M. Caulo, V. Pizzella, M. Olivetti Belardinelli, and G. L. Romani A Frontoparietal Network for Spatial Attention Reorienting in the Auditory Domain: A Human fMRI/MEG Study of Functional and Temporal Dynamics Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1139 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Ruff, S. Bestmann, F. Blankenburg, O. Bjoertomt, O. Josephs, N. Weiskopf, R. Deichmann, and J. Driver Distinct Causal Influences of Parietal Versus Frontal Areas on Human Visual Cortex: Evidence from Concurrent TMS-fMRI Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 817 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Mitchell Activity in Right Temporo-Parietal Junction is Not Selective for Theory-of-Mind Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 262 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ansari, I. M. Lyons, L. van Eimeren, and F. Xu Linking Visual Attention and Number Processing in the Brain: The Role of the Temporo-parietal Junction in Small and Large Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Number Comparison. J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2007; 19(11): 1845 - 1853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Shulman, S. V. Astafiev, M. P. McAvoy, G. d'Avossa, and M. Corbetta Right TPJ Deactivation during Visual Search: Functional Significance and Support for a Filter Hypothesis Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2625 - 2633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Indovina and E. Macaluso Dissociation of Stimulus Relevance and Saliency Factors during Shifts of Visuospatial Attention Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1701 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Serences and S. Yantis Spatially Selective Representations of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Priority in Human Occipital, Parietal, and Frontal Cortex Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 284 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Fox, M. Corbetta, A. Z. Snyder, J. L. Vincent, and M. E. Raichle Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems PNAS, June 27, 2006; 103(26): 10046 - 10051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Ruff and J. Driver Attentional preparation for a lateralized visual distractor: behavioral and fMRI evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2006; 18(4): 522 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Kincade, R. A. Abrams, S. V. Astafiev, G. L. Shulman, and M. Corbetta An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention J. Neurosci., May 4, 2005; 25(18): 4593 - 4604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bledowski, D. Prvulovic, K. Hoechstetter, M. Scherg, M. Wibral, R. Goebel, and D. E. J. Linden Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study J. Neurosci., October 20, 2004; 24(42): 9353 - 9360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |